green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.0 score
“the instant case involves a regulatory action in a highly regulated industry in which the government took actions that reasonably should have been expected by plaintiffs ....”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Folden v. United States
the instant case involves a regulatory action in a highly regulated industry in which the government took actions that reasonably should have been expected by plaintiffs ....
cited
Cited "see"
CATHERINE DICKASON v. YSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
See Hamilton v. Komatsu Dresser Industries, - 9 - Inc., 964 F.2d 600 , 603 n.1 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 916 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritrans Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Branch v. United States, 69 F.3d 1571 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 55 , 136 L.Ed.2d 18 (1996); Golden Pacific Bancorp, v. United States, 15 F.3d 1066, 1073-74 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 961 , 115 S.Ct. 420 , 130 L.Ed.2d 335 (1994); see also California Housing Securities, Inc. v. United States, 959 F.2d 955 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Porter
v.
United States Chiarelli v. United States Durish v. United States Raucci v. United States and Porter v. United States
v.
United States Chiarelli v. United States Durish v. United States Raucci v. United States and Porter v. United States
No. 92-141; No. 92-5280; No. 92-5314; No. 92-5367; No. 92-5368.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
506 U.S. 916
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 1569.