green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Oveal
unless there is a reasonable possibility that the improperly admitted evidence contributed to the conviction, reversal is not required.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse T. Griffin
See United States v. Lopez, 979 F.2d 1024, 1032 (5th Cir.1992) (concluding that “the integrity of the judicial proceeding was not threatened by the government’s attempts to clarify the testimony” of a witness), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 2349 , 124 L.Ed.2d 258 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ailsworth
See United States v. Brewer, 983 F.2d 181, 185 (10th Cir.) (“A conspiracy participant is legally liable for all reasonably foreseeable acts of his or her coconspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy.”) (citing Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 646-47 , 66 S.Ct 1180, 1184 , 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946)), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 2348 , 124 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Denise Brown-Kimble, Etc.
See United States v. Hegwood, 977 F.2d 492, 496 (9th Cir.1992) ("[W]hen the defendant 'opens the door' to testimony by raising it for the first time himself, he cannot complain about subsequent government inquiry into that issue."), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 913 (1993); United States v. Segal, 852 F.2d 1152, 1155 (9th Cir.1988) ("invited error" doctrine entitles the government to pursue inquiry into matter if evidence thereon was first introduced by the defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lozano
See United States v. Brewer, 983 F.2d 181, 184-85 (10th Cir.) (defendants convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud were properly required to pay restitution for entire amount of loss suffered by manufacturers as result of conspiracy), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 2348 , 124 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993); United States v. Clark, 957 F.2d 248, 253 (6th Cir.1992) (indicating that if the defendant had been convicted of conspiracy to commit all counts charged in indictment, he could have been ordered to pay restitution for all counts charged in indictment); United States v. Sharp, 941 F.2d 811, …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Vega and James Leonis
See United States v. Hegwood, 977 F.2d 492, 497 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., Wilson v. United States, 508 U.S. 913 (1993). 25 The defendants' reliance on United States v. Melchor-Lopez, 627 F.2d 886 (9th Cir.1980), is misplaced.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Brewer, 10th Cir., 983 F.2d 181, 184-85 (‘When a defendant is convicted of conspiracy, a ... restitution award may encompass all losses resulting from the conspiracy.”), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 2348 , 124 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993); Commonwealth v. Mathis, Pa.Supr., 464 A.2d 362, 368 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malbon
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-1631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1993.
508 U.S. 913
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.