discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Archie Joyner pinkerton is not a broad principle of vicarious liability that imposes criminal responsibility upon every co-conspirator for whatever substantive offenses any of their confederates commit.

cited Cited "see" United States v. Norman T. See United States v. Abreu, 962 F.2d 1425, 1430 (10th Cir.1992), vacated on other grounds, 508 U.S. 935 , 113 S.Ct. 2405 , 124 L.Ed.2d 630 (1993) (conducting plain error analysis).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nathan J. (A Juvenile) See United States v. Brown, 411 F.2d 1134, 1138 (10th Cir.1969) (noting that "pure hearsay is inadmissible because such testimony carries no inherent likelihood of truthfulness and denies to the damaged party the right of cross-examination...."). 32 This conclusion is supported by our decision in United States v. Abreu, 962 F.2d 1425, 1430 (10th Cir.1992), vacated on other grounds, 508 U.S. 935 (1993).

discussed Cited "see" Morrow v. Winslow (2×) See United States v. Abreu, 962 F.2d 1447, 1450 (10th Cir.1992) ("[w]hen the plain language of [a] statute does not unambiguously reveal its meaning, we turn to the legislative history"), vacated on other grounds, 508 U.S. 935 , 113 S.Ct. 2405 , 124 L.Ed.2d 630 (1993) (mem.).