green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Babson
See State v. Plowman, 314 Or 157, 164 , 838 P2d 558 (1992), cert den, 508 US 974 (1993) (describing three categories of Robertson framework).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp.
See Versyss, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 654-57 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Stoutt v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico
See Versyss, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 654 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Stoutt v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
See Versyss, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 654 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jong E. Lee v. Ernst & Young, LLP
See Versyss Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 657-58 (1st Cir.1992) (holding that, by operation of merger *976 law, securities of acquired company ceased to exist upon their relinquishment to the acquiring company-and therefore.no § 11 claim could be asserted by the acquiring company against the accountant for the acquired company even though, ordinarily, “under section 11, accountants are held to demanding standards when they certify registration statements and are liable to remote purchasers well beyond more predictable common law limits”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 508 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Ernst & Young, LLP
See Versyss Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 657-58 (1st Cir. 1992) (holding that, by operation of merger law, securities of acquired company ceased to exist upon their relinquishment to the acquiring company and therefore no § 11 claim could be asserted by the acquiring company against the accountant for the acquired company even though, ordinarily, "under section 11, accountants are held to demanding standards when they certify registration statements and are liable to remote purchasers well beyond more predictable common law limits") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smallwood v. Fisk
(2×)
See generally State v. Plowman, 314 Or 157, 163-64 , 838 P2d 558 (1992), cert den 508 US 974 , 113 S Ct 2967 , 125 L Ed 2d 666 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Elizabeth Wilson, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Ailsa Debold v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.
See Versyss, Inc. v. Coopers and Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 654 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Enertech Electrical, Inc. v. Mahoning County Commissioners
See Brickner v. Voinovich, 977 F.2d 235, 238 (6th Cir.1992) (arguments not presented to the district court are generally considered waived), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993). 19 Although we have been urged by Enertech as well as amici curiae, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and Ohio ABC, Inc., we decline to reach the argument regarding the general legality of project labor agreements in Ohio public works contracts. 20 When a party fails to present an argument to the district court, we have discretion to resolve the issue only where the proper resol…
discussed
Cited "see"
Enertech Electrical, Inc. v. Mahoning County Commissioners
See Brickner v. Voinovich, 977 F.2d 235, 238 (6th Cir.1992) (arguments not presented to the district court are generally considered waived), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
William Alpern v. Utilicorp United
See Versyss Inc. v. Coopers and Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 655 (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., Appellee
See Versyss Inc. v. Coopers and Lybrand, 982 F.2d 653, 655 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2965 , 125 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
If the statute focuses on expression per se, then it is unconstitutional unless the state can demonstrate that “the restraint is wholly confined within some historical exception that was well established when the first American guarantees of freedom of expression were adopted and that the guarantees then or in 1859 demonstrably were not intended to reach.” State v. Robertson, 293 Or 402, 412 , *86 649 P2d 569 (1982); see also State v. Plowman, 314 Or 157, 164 , 838 P2d 558 (1992), cert den, 508 US 974 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Illig-Renn
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Plowman, 314 Or. 157, 160 , 838 P.2d 558 (1992), cert den, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2967 , 125 L.Ed.2d 666 (1993); State v. Chakerian, 325 Or. 370, 382 , 938 P.2d 756 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rangel
See also State v. Plowman, 314 Or 157 , 838 P2d 558 (1992), cert den 508 US 974 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Welfare of S.M.J.
See, e.g., State v. Plowman, 314 Or. 157 , 838 P.2d 558, 561 (1992) (words “because of’ in Oregon’s bias crime statute require proof of causal connection between crime and assailant’s motivation), cer t. denied, 508 U.S. 974 , 113 S.Ct. 2967 , 125 L.Ed.2d 666 (1993); In re M.S., 10 Cal.4th 698 , 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 355, 367-68 , 896 P.2d 1365, 1377 (1995) (words “because of’ in context of bias crime statute connote causal link between assailant’s conduct and victim’s characteristic).
Plowman
v.
Oregon
v.
Oregon
No. 92-6702.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1993.
508 U.S. 974
Published
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.