green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Quair v. Bega
See United States v. James, 980 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir, 1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 119 , 126 L.Ed.2d 84 (1993) [Tribe was immune from process as they possessed tribal immunity at the time the subpoena was served, thereby affirming the district’s court’s decision to quash the subpoena and request for production of documents]; see also Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 291 F.3d 549 (9th Cir.2002)[“this court reaffirms James and holds that the Tribe is possessed of sovereign immunity which bars the execution of the warrant”], vacated and remanded on other grounds 538 U…
cited
Cited "see"
Ford v. Hubbard
See Ford v. California, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 118 , 126 L.Ed.2d 83 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Attorney General of the State of California, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest. Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest
See Ford v. California, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 118 , 126 L.Ed.2d 83 (1993). 53 On April 19, 1997, Ford signed and delivered to the prison authorities a pro se federal habeas corpus petition.
cited
Cited "see"
Ford v. Hubbard
See Ford v. California, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 118 , 126 L.Ed.2d 83 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Attorney General of the State of California, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest. Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest
See Ford v. California, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 118 , 126 L.Ed.2d 83 (1993). 13 On April 19, 1997, Ford signed and delivered to the prison authorities a pro se federal habeas corpus petition.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rollins
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Von Villas, 11 Cal. App. 4th 175, 220 , 15 Cal. Rptr. 2d 112, 138 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) (holding that to make a marital communication in confidence, “one must intend nondisclosure and have a reasonable expectation of privacy” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 838 (1993). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Howard
See also People v. Von Villas, Cal.App.2d Dist., 11 Cal.App.4th 175 , 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 112, 133 (1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 838 , 114 S.Ct. 118 , 126 L.Ed.2d 83 (1993) (recognizing that Lanza’s holding that confidential relationships would "continue to receive unceasing protection despite the jailhouse setting”); In re Joseph A., supra at n. 22.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griswold
v.
Bryant, Attorney General of Arkansas
v.
Bryant, Attorney General of Arkansas
92-8878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Griswold
v.
Bryant, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al.
No. 92-8878.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 989 F. 2d 504.