Henry ex rel. Chanry Commc'ns, Ltd. v. Wetzler, 511 U.S. 1126 (1994). · Go Syfert
Henry ex rel. Chanry Commc'ns, Ltd. v. Wetzler, 511 U.S. 1126 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. (lactapp, 2000-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
La. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here an expert presents nothing but conclusionsno facts, no hint of an inferential process, no discussion of hypotheses considered and rejected', such testimony will be insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
discussed Cited "see" Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Russell
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See KPERS v. Reimer & Koger Assoc,, Inc., 4 F.3d 614 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1126 , 114 S.Ct. 2132 , 128 L.Ed.2d 862 (1994); KPERS v. Reimer & Koger Assoc., Inc., 60 F.3d 1304 (8th Cir.1995); KPERS v. Reimer & Koger Assoc., Inc., 61 F.3d 608 (8th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 915 , 133 L.Ed.2d 845 (1996); KPERS v. Reimer & Koger Assoc., Inc., 77 F.3d 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 359 , 136 L.Ed.2d 250 (1996); In re KPERS, 85 F.3d 1353 (8th Cir.1996); KPERS v. Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, L.C., 114 F.3d 679 (8th Cir.1997…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hummel v. County of Saginaw
E.D. Mich. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc., 8 F.3d 88, 92 (1st Cir.1993), cert denied, 511 U.S. 1126 , 114 S.Ct. 2133 , *818 128 L.Ed.2d 868 (1994)(“Although an expert affidavit need not include details about all of the raw data used to produce a conclusion, ... it must at least include the factual basis and the process of reasoning which makes the conclusion viable in order to defeat a motion for summary judgement.”) 2 The Court finds that Dr. Malik’s statement is woefully inadequate to create a fact issue on whether plaintiff was qualified to return to work, especially in light of the in…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Karay Restaurant Corp. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
N.Y. App. Div. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Second, issues that are not raised at the administrative hearing level are unpreserved for consideration by the Tribunal on administrative appeal or by this Court on judicial review (see, Matter ofXuong Trieu v Tax Appeals Tribunal, 222 AD2d 743, 744 , appeal dismissed 87 NY2d 1054 , lv denied 88 NY2d 809 ; see also, Matter of Henry v Wetzler, 82 NY2d 859, 862 , cert denied 511 US 1126 ; Matter of University Hgts.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Everett Kyle Hall, Also Known as Eric, Also Known as Shorty, United States of America v. Randall Joe Hall, United States of America v. Roy Lee Hall
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pearson, 8 F.3d 631, 633 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1126 , 114 S.Ct. 2132 , 128 L.Ed.2d 863 (1994), citing with apparent approval United States v. Tous, 461 F.2d 656, 657 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam ), which held that § 5861(d) was within the scope of the taxing clause.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Everett Kyle Hall (2×)
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pearson, 8 F.3d 631, 633 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1126 , 114 S.Ct. 2132 , 128 L.Ed.2d 863 (1994), citing with apparent approval United States v. Tous, 461 F.2d 656, 657 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam), which held that § 5861(d) was within the scope of the taxing clause.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stahlbrodt v. Commissioner of Taxation & Finance
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
In the action sub judice, the sales tax on the sale of printing services is one of general applicability (see, Tax Law § 1105 [c] [2]) which does not single out the press, unlike the tax in Minneapolis Star (supra; see also, Matter of Henry v Wetzler, 82 NY2d 859, 861 , cert denied 511 US 1126 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry, Individually and on Behalf of Chanry Communications, Ltd.
v.
Wetzler, Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
No. 93-1436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1994.
511 U.S. 1126

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.