green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Conoco, Inc. v. State Taxation & Revenue Department
See NCR Corp. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 115 N.M. 612, 618-20 , 856 P.2d 982, 988-90 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 115 N.M. 677 , 857 P.2d 788 (1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1245 , 114 S.Ct. 2763 , 129 L.Ed.2d 877 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Muralo Co. v. EMPLOYERS INS. WAUSAU
See, e.g., Morton Int'l v. General Acc. Ins., 266 N.J.Super. 300, 340-341 , 629 A. 2d 895 (App.Div. 1991), aff'd, 134 N.J. 1 , 629 A. 2d 831 (1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1245 , 114 S.Ct. 2764 , 129 L.Ed. 2d 878 (1994); Universal-Rundle v. Commercial Ins., 319 N.J.Super. 223, 242 , 725 A. 2d 76 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 161 N.J. 149 , 735 A. 2d 574 (1999); Trustees of Princeton Univ. v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 293 N.J.Super. 296, 301-305 , 680 A. 2d 783 (App.Div.1996), leave to appeal granted, 147 N.J. 574 , 688 A. 2d 1050 (1997); Rutgers v. Liberty Mut.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Pacheco
(2×)
The Rule of Lenity 66 In light of the inherent ambiguity in INA § 101(a)(43)(F) & (G), I believe we must apply the rule of lenity to interpret the statute in Pacheco's favor. 67 The rule of lenity provides that "ambiguous laws which impose penal sanctions are to be strictly construed against the Government." United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 120 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 (1983); see also Dauray, 215 F.3d at 264 (suggesting that rule of lenity has constitutional underpinnings rooted in due process notions of "fair warning"). "[B]efore a man can be punished as a crimina…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. v. American Insurance
See also Morton Int’l, Inc. v. General Accident Ins., 134 N.J. 1, 75 , 629 A.2d 831 , cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1245 , 114 S.Ct. 2764 , 129 L.Ed.2d 878 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Insurance Company of North America
v.
Morton International, Inc.
v.
Morton International, Inc.
No. 93-1797.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1994.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. N. J. Motion[*1246] of Insurance Environmental Litigation Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.