green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pruett v. Norris
we frankly cannot see how anyone could naturally take this statement to be a comment on failure to testify.
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LINDA RAY GARDNER, —
See United States v. Robinson, 485 U.S. 25, 31-34 , 108 S.Ct. 864 , 99 L.Ed.2d 23 (1988); accord Pollard *989 v. Delo, 28 F.3d 887, 889 (8th Cir.) (“how the prosecutor’s statements may be characterized is a mixed question of law and fact, which we review under a de novo standard”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 518 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda Ray Gardner
See United States v. Robinson, 485 U.S. 25, 31-34 (1988); accord Pollard v. Delo, 28 F.3d 887, 889 (8th Cir.) (“how the prosecutor’s statements may be characterized is a mixed question of law and fact, which we review under a de novo standard”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Sigmund Corum
See Carter v. Peters, 26 F.3d 697 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 517 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994) (finding that a statute that enhanced penalties for crimes committed in houses of worship had neither a religious purpose nor the principal effect of advancing religion).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Sigmund Corum
See Carter v. Peters, 26 F.3d 697 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 (1994) (finding that a statute that enhanced penalties for crimes committed in houses of worship had neither a religious purpose nor the principal effect of advancing religion).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael L. Craycraft
See Pollard v. Delo, 28 F.3d 887, 888 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 518 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994), citing McClesky v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 494 , 111 S.Ct. 1454, 1471 , 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Lloyd Craycraft
See Pollard v. Delo, 28 F.3d 887, 888 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 518 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994), citing McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 494 , 111 S.Ct. 1454, 1471 , 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Benton
See Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 323, 328 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 518 , 130 L.Ed.2d 424 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grant v. State
(2×)
In other words, counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigations unnecessary."); Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 384 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) (quoting Strickland ); see also Brown v. State, 1994 OK CR 12 , 871 P.2d 56, 76 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1003 , 115 S.Ct. 517 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994). [7] See Brecheen, 41 F.3d at 1369 ("[I]t is important to note that `the mere incantation of "strategy" does not insulate attorney behavior from review, an attorney must have chosen not to present mitigating evid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. McDaniel
With respect to defendant’s Establishment Clause argument, we additionally note that to the extent the misdemeanor classification of Penal Law § 240.21 affords greater protection to those attending worship services than is generally available to those attending secular .meetings (compare, Penal Law § 240.20 [4], with Election Law § 5-204 [9]; § 17-168; see also, Penal Law § 240.30 [3]), the statute does not impermissibly advance religion over nonreligion (see, Carter v Peters, 26 F2d 697, cert denied 513 US 1003 ; see generally, Lemon v Kurtzman, 403 US 602 ).
Brown
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5815.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Arkansas (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.