Schmidt v. Espy, 115 S. Ct. 43 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Schmidt v. Espy, 115 S. Ct. 43 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MBIA Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance (cadc, 2013-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" MBIA Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See RTC v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111, 122 (2d Cir.1994), vacated on other grounds, 513 U.S. 801 , 115 S.Ct. 43 , 130 L.Ed.2d 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater (2×)
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schmidt v. Espy, 513 U. S. 801 (1994) (GVR on the basis of the Solicitor General's representation that "[a]fter further examination of the regulation and its application in the present case, . . . the Department of Agriculture has determined that petitioners' leaseback/buyback application should be reconsidered without respect to the good faith requirement," Brief for Respondent in Schmidt v. Espy , O.
cited Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solomon v. Resolution Trust Corp., — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 43 , 130 L.Ed.2d 5 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corporation v. Selma Diamond
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solomon v. Resolution Trust Corp., --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 43 , 130 L.Ed.2d 5 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Kerusa, 906 N.E.2d at 1054 ; see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir.1994) (explaining Martin Act’s detailed process for submitting offering plans for Attorney General approval), vacated, 513 U.S. 801 , 115 S.Ct. 43 , 44, 130 L.Ed.2d 5 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas v. American Home Products, Inc.
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Schmidt v. Espy, 513 U. S. 801 (1994) (GVR in light of administrative reinterpretations of federal statutes); Crouse v. United States, ante, p. 801 (GVR in light of Koon v. United States, 518 U. S. 81 (1996)); Greater N. O.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul G. SCHMIDT, Pauline B. Schmidt, Paul A. Schmidt and Aero Corporation
v.
Mike ESPY, Secretary of Agriculture
No. 93-1707.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
115 S. Ct. 43
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position presently asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed August 1, 1994.