green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
" '[N]o legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us' to an enactment's 'pre-eminent purpose.' "
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bown v. Gwinnett County School District
o legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us' to an enactment's 'pre-eminent purpose.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Wenzel
See In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 53 , 130 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994) (The Court of Appeals is bound by precedent of prior panels of Court of Appeals absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court.); Haynes v. Williams, 88 F.3d 898 , 900 n. 4 (10th Cir.1996) (A published decision of one panel of the Court of Appeals constitutes binding circuit precedent.); In re Vaughan, 311 B.R. 573, 585 (10th Cir.BAP2004) (A Tenth Circuit BAP panel is bound by a prior BAP panel decision.); In re Blagg, 223 B.R. 795, 804 (1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley
See United States v. Restivo, 8 F.3d 274, 278 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fabian Aguayo-Delgado
See United States v. Eng, 14 F.3d 165, 172-73 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 54 , 130 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994); see also United States v. Bongiorno, 139 F.3d 640, 641 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (citing this discussion in Eng), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 865 , 119 S.Ct. 155 , 142 L.Ed.2d 127 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguayo-Delgado
See United States v. Eng, 14 F.3d 165, 172-73 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994); see also United States v. Bongiorno, 139 F.3d 640, 641 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) -10- (citing this discussion in Eng), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 865 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Smith
See In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) (per curiam), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 53 , 130 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornett
See United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1080 (5th Cir. 1981) (citing United States v. Walls, 577 F.2d 690, 697 ) (9th Cir. 1978)) 4 We review only under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43 because “it is clear that there is no constitutional right for a defendant to be present at a conference in chambers concerning dismissal of a juror.” Provenzano, 620 F.2d at 997 (citing United States v. Howell, 514 F.2d 710, 713 (5th Cir. 1975)). 7 facts from which jurors, as the sole triers of fact and credibility, could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness."…
discussed
Cited "see"
Zerr v. Adams Co. Sch Dist
See In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir. 1993) ("We cannot overrule the judgment of another panel of this court ... absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mylene Rae Zerr v. Nancy Jo Johnson Adams County School District No. 12, Themia E. Sandven, Attorney-Appellee
See In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) ("We cannot overrule the judgment of another panel of this court ... absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Mortham
(2×)
See Church of Scientology Flag Service, Org., Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 2 F.3d 1509, 1514 (11th Cir, 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 54 , 130 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thompson
See, e.g., In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir. 1993) (appellate panel is "bound by the precedent of prior panels"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth L. Thompson
See, e.g., In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) (appellate panel is "bound by the precedent of prior panels"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994). 7 Second, Mr. Thompson claims the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his convictions for intent to distribute methamphetamine. 8 [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence ... [we] review the record de novo "and ask only whether, taking the evidence--'both direct and circumstantial, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom'--in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable jury could find the de…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Pelletreau & Pelletreau
See e.g., FDIC v. Cocke, 7 F.3d 396, 400 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 53 , 130 L.Ed.2d 12 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bown v. Gwinnett County School District
See also Church of Scientology v. City of Clearwater, 2 F.3d 1514, 1527 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 54 , 130 L.Ed.2d 13 (1994) (‘“[N]o legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us’ to an enactment’s ‘pre-eminent purpose.’ ”) (quoting Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39, 41 , 101 S.Ct. 192, 194 , 66 L.Ed.2d 199 (1980) (per curiam)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrison
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Cocke
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Cocke
No. 93-1483; No. 93-1485.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 807
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.