green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.9 score
“sorting out whether a permissible or impermissible reason underlies a peremptory challenge is the function of the trial judge, and we do not substitute our judgment for his if there is support for it on the record”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Sudler
sorting out whether a permissible or impermissible reason underlies a peremptory challenge is the function of the trial judge, and we do not substitute our judgment for his if there is support for it on the record
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Nelson
choice of remedy was. . . the prerogative of the judge
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tomlin v. State
choice of remedy was ... the prerogative of the judge
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. LeClair
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the determination whether the defendant's explanation for each challenge was sufficient to establish a nondiscriminatory basis within the judge's discretion
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Garrey
See Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8, 15 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 951 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Christian
See Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8, 18-19 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 951 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Benoit
See also Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 10-12 & nn. 2-6, cert. denied, 513 U.S. 951 (1994) (upholding denial of peremptory challenges on basis of judge’s “conclu[sion] that the defendant did not have legitimate gender-neutral reasons” for his challenges to some, but not all, of the women he challenged).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc. v. Holland
See, e.g., Burton v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Comm’n, 23 F.3d 208, 209-10 (8th Cir.1994) cert. denied 513 U.S. 951 , 115 S.Ct. 366 , 130 L.Ed.2d 318 (1994) (consumer of electric power cannot show likelihood of redressability of injury where consumer sues commission which taxes power company seeking a reduction in the taxes to power company on theory that power company will offer corresponding lower rates to consumer, and court declines to speculate as to reaction of power company to reduced rates where power company is not a party to the suit).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Jordan
See, e.g., Jarrett v. US Sprint Communications Co., 22 F3d 256, 259 (10th Cir), cert den 513 US 951 (1994) (payment of court filing fee); In re Arnett, 731 F2d 358, 362 (6th Cir 1984) (perfection of security interests under bankruptcy law).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5807.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1994.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.