Evans v. Resolution Trust Corp., 513 U.S. 986 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Evans v. Resolution Trust Corp., 513 U.S. 986 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Abdur-Raheem Akram (ca6, 1999-01-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Abdur-Raheem Akram (2×)
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pasquarille, 20 F.3d 682, 690 (6th Cir.) (citing Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 986 , 115 S.Ct. 481 , 130 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grimes v. Vitalink Communications Corp., 17 F.3d 1553, 1562-64 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 986 , 115 S.Ct. 480 , 130 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); Sandler Assocs., L.P. v. BellSouth Corp., 818 F.Supp. 695, 704-05 (D.Del.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 123 (3d Cir.1994); *559 accord Matsushita Elec.
discussed Cited "see" Henderson v. United States
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Holmberg, 19 F. 3d 1062 (CA5), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 986 (1994); Libby v. United States, 840 F. 2d 818 (CA11 1988); Amelia v. United States, 732 F. 2d 711 (CA9 1984); Battaglia v. United States, 303 F. 2d 683 (CA2), cert. dism’d, 371 U. S. 907 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Epstein (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re MCA, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, 598 A. 2d 687 (1991). [3] Compare the decision below with Grimes v. Vitalink Communications Corp., 17 F. 3d 1553 (CA3), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 986 (1994); Nottingham Partners v. Trans-Lux Corp., 925 F. 2d 29 (CA1 1991); and Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F. 2d 759 (CA2 1968). [4] In fact, the Chancery Court rejected the first settlement, which contained no opt-out provision, as unfair to the class precisely because it believed that the settlement would preclude the class from pursuing their exclusively federal claims in federal court.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Darnell Lecato Burks
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jonsson, 15 F.3d 759, 762 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 986 , 115 S.Ct. 480 , 130 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994) (finding that, even though the defendant had not yet indicated the number of bombs he wanted to purchase, his acts constituted a substantial step because he “continued to negotiate with the government agents until his arrest prevented him from doing so” ); United States v. Mims, 812 F.2d 1068, 1078 (8th Cir.1987) (finding that the defendant’s acts constituted a substantial step because “[ujnlike Joyce , in the present case it was [another party], rather …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Darnell Lecato Burks
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jonsson, 15 F.3d 759, 762 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 986 (1994) (finding that, even though the defendant had not yet indicated the number of bombs he wanted to purchase, his acts constituted a substantial step because he "continued to negotiate with the government agents until his arrest prevented him from doing so" ); United States v. Mims, 812 F.2d 1068, 1078 (8th Cir. 1987) (finding that the defendant's acts constituted a substantial step because "[u]nlike Joyce, in the present case it was [another party], rather than [the defendant], who ended the negoti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Evans, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Daley
v.
Resolution Trust Corporation, Receiver for University Savings Assn.
No. 94-257.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1994.
513 U.S. 986
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.