green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eaton
See United States v. Libretti, 38 F.3d 523, 529 (10th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1035 (1995) (we review de novo whether a plea was knowing and voluntary). -15- CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Mr. Eaton’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and DISMISS the appeal of his sentence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. El Moghrabi
See paragraph (4) of subsection c."); see also Anderson v. Nidorf, 26 F. 3d 100 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1035 , 115 S.Ct. 1399 , 131 L.Ed. 2d 287 (1995) (upholding California's Anti Piracy statute, which, in pertinent part, is indistinguishable from ours, as a valid protection of the public against commercial deception and as neither preempted by federal copyright law, facially invalid under the First Amendment, nor overbroad).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estabrook v. United States
Collateral estoppel ... serves to “relieve parties of the cost and vexation of multiple lawsuits, conserve judicial resources, and, by preventing inconsistent decisions, encourage reliance on adjudication.” United States v. Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154, 158 , 104 S.Ct. 568 , 78 L.Ed.2d 379 (1984) (citations omitted) (quoting Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980)); see also Arkla, Inc. v. United States, 37 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1035 , 115 S.Ct. 1399 , 131 L.Ed.2d 287 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Nidorf, Chief Probation Officer
v.
Nidorf, Chief Probation Officer
No. 94-770.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 1995.
514 U.S. 1035
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.