green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 · 2 courts ·
…any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lawlor v. Commonwealth
ransporting from the robbery scene was . . . separate and apart from, and not merely incidental to, the robbery and was greater than the restraint intrinsic in a robbery.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman, No. Cv99 0334654 S (Nov. 22, 2000)
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ochoa
“Appellate courts have required more than an equivocal request for self-representation before they engage in a full-blown Faretta inquiry.” Reese v. Nix, 942 F.2d 1276, 1280 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1113 , 112 S.Ct. 1220 , 117 L.Ed.2d 457 (1992); see State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 926 (Mo.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995) (holding, “[a]bsent a clear and unequivocal assertion of the right to self-representation, the trial court is obligated neither to permit self-representation nor to conduct a hearing”); see also Faretta v. Cal…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pleasant
See United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1062-63 (4th Cir.1994) (in reviewing the sufficiency of the indictment, the court applies a heightened standard of scrutiny when the challenge is made prior to the verdict), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995); United States v. Sutton, 961 F.2d 476, 478-79 (4th Cir.1992) (same), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 858 , 113 S.Ct. 171 , 121 L.Ed.2d 118 , (1992); United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1200-01 (4th Cir.1990) (same), cert. denied 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stewart
See State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 922-923 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Izydore
See United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1067 (4th Cir.1994) (noting that the interstate nexus requirement of wire fraud is not a substantive element, but arises from constitutional limitations on congressional power over intrastate activities), ce rt. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Izydore Harry Schreiber
See United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1067 (4th Cir.1994) (noting that the interstate nexus requirement of wire fraud is not a substantive element, but arises from constitutional limitations on congressional power over intrastate activities), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995). 19 In this case, there is sufficient evidence supporting Schreiber's conviction for conspiracy under count one.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Izydore
See United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1067 (4th Cir.1994) (noting that the interstate nexus requirement of wire fraud is not a substantive element, but arises from constitutional limitations on congressional power over intrastate activities), ce rt. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Munoz
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S. Ct. 1825 , 131 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munoz
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1825 , 131 L.Ed.2d 746 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnston
See State v. Parker 886 S.W.2d 908, 918 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995); State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 291 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Whiffen
See United States v. Myers, 104 F.3d 76, 81 (5th Cir.1997), United States v. Himelwright, 42 F.3d 777, 782-83 (3d Cir.1994), United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1063-66 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Whiffen
See United States v. Myers, 104 F.3d 76, 81 (5th Cir. 1997), United States v. Himelwright, 42 F.2d 777, 782-83 (3d Cir. 1994), United States v. Darby, 37 F.3d 1059, 1063-66 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cardwell v. Netherland
(2×)
See Cardwell v. Com., 248 Va. 501 , 450 S.E.2d 146, 150-155 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , *1006 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Commonwealth
See Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 501, 515 , 450 S.E.2d 146, 155 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995) (suggesting Simmons not applicable where punishment fixed upon "vileness" predicate).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carson
(2×)
State v. Wise, 879 S.W.2d 494, 517 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1093 , 115 S.Ct. 757 , 130 L.Ed.2d 656 (1995); See State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 923 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roll
See State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 929 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995); Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 866 , 110 S.Ct. 186 , 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alan Jeffrey Bannister v. Paul K. Delo
See Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 50-51 (1984) 18 We note that the study upon which Bannister relies in support of his assertion that the capital data base is incomplete indicates that it was submitted to the Missouri Supreme Court in State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908 (Mo. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1827 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wright
See State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 922 (Mo.banc 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995) (“A defendant may not provoke a reply to his own argument and then assert error.”) Regardless, as observed in State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753 (Mo.banc 1996): In many instances seasoned trial counsel do not object to otherwise improper questions or arguments for strategic purposes.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. White
See State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 917 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See also Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 501, 509 , 450 S.E.2d 146, 151 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1097 , 115 S.Ct. 1826 , 131 L.Ed.2d 747 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harris
See, e.g., State v. Parker, 886 S.W. 2d 908, 917 (Mo.1994) (refusing disclosure of police personnel file where defendant made no showing concerning the materiality or exculpatory nature of the file's contents), cert. denied sub nom Parker v. Missouri, 514 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed. 2d 748 (1995); Cargill v. State, 255 Ga. 616 , 340 S.E. 2d 891, 911 (Ga.1986) (concluding belief that police officers testifying would give perjured testimony, where defense counsel articulated no basis for such belief, was insufficient to permit disclosure of officers' personnel files).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
See also State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 917 (Mo. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995) (noting that the mere possibility that personnel files of police witnesses might include helpful information, unsupported by any facts, is insufficient to justify an in camera review of personnel files); Cargill v. Stale, 255 Ga. 616, 340 S.E.2d 891, 911 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1101 , 107 S.Ct. 1328 , 94 L.Ed.2d 180 (1987) (holding that because defense counsel could not articulate a basis for a belief that police would give perjured testimony, the trial court i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smulls
(2×)
A court should rarely grant relief for assertions of plain error based on a prosecutor's statements during closing argument "because, absent an objection, the trial court's options are limited to an invited interference with summation, which increases the risk of error." Storey, 901 S.W.2d at 897 ; See also State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 923-24 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995); State v. Wise, 879 S.W.2d 494, 516 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 757 , 130 L.Ed.2d 656 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. George
See also State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 929 (Mo. banc 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1827 , 131 L.Ed.2d 748 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Soto
v.
Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
v.
Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
No. 94-7968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1995.
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.