green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Shreveport v. Noel Estate, Inc.
See State, Dept. of Transp. and Development v. McMillion Dozer Service, Inc., 93-590 (La.App. 5th Cir.05/31/94), 639 So.2d 766 , writ denied, *85 94-2345, 94-2348 (La.11/29/94), 646 So.2d 399 , cert denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Motorola, Inc., a Corporation Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, and Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.
See Maro Leather Co. v. Aerolineas Argentinas, 161 Misc.2d 920 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 617 , 620 (1994) (awarding prejudgment interest in a case involving the loss of goods under the Convention), ce rt. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995); Eli Lilly Argentina, S.A. v. Aerolineas Argentinas, 133 Misc.2d 858 , 508 N.Y.S.2d 865, 867 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Bilodeau v. Mega Industries
See id. (quoting Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 12 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995)).
cited
Cited "see"
Strassman v. Lakeshore Const.
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 12 (1st Cir. 1994), cert, denied, 514 U.S. 1108 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Eckel Industries, Inc. v. Primary Bank
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 12 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Schroeder v. Sager Elec. Supply
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 12 (1st Cir. 1994), cert, denied, 514 U.S. 1108 (1995); see also Woods v. Friction Materials, Inc., 30 F.3d 255, 259 (1st Cir. 1994) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ivan RUIZ, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POSADAS DE SAN JUAN ASSOCIATES, Defendant, Appellee
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 16 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995) (stating that relief will not be granted “to a plaintiff who has been discharged unfairly, even by the most irrational of managers, unless the facts and circumstances indicate that discriminatory animus was the reason for the decision”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conner v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 16 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995) (Title VII — sex discrimination); Holt v. KMI-Continental, Inc., 95 F.3d 123, 129 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1819 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997) (§ 1981 and Title VII — race and sex discrimination); Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 762 (3d Cir.1994) (Title VII — national origin discrimination); Evans v. Technologies Applications & Serv.
cited
Cited "see"
Rosen v. Casiano Communications, Inc.
See Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc., 40 F.3d 11, 15 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995); Vega v. Kodak Caribbean Ltd., 3 F.3d 476, 479 (1st Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Ezzone v. Riccardi, 525 N.W.2d 388, 398 (Iowa 1994) (stating that aiding and abetting liability cannot attach unless the primary party commits a wrong, the aider knows of the wrong, and the aider substantially assists the achievement of the primary violation), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995); National Westminster Bank v. Weksel, 124 A.D.2d 144 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 626, 630 (noting that plaintiff must establish that alleged aider and abettor acted with intention of advancing the tortious activity), appeal denied, 70 N.Y.2d 604 , 519 N.Y.S.2d 1027 , 513 N.E.2d…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sigros v. Walt Disney World Co.
I, 960 F.2d at 1089; see also Pritzker v. Yari, 42 F.3d 53, 60-61 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1959 , 131 L.Ed.2d 851 (1995). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dystar Corp. v. Canto
See, e.g., In re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 848 F.Supp. 318, 327 (D.R.I.1994), affm’d, 43 F.3d 763 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1108 , 115 S.Ct. 1959 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995) (nonparty admitted he had read injunction at his deposition and therefore had notice of the order).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMillion Dozer Service, Inc.
v.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
v.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
No. 94-1446.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1995.
Published
Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.