green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1999 ·
…we conclude that appellant has failed to show that executing him after fifteen years on death row, during which time he faced at least seven execution dates, would constitute cruel and unusual punishment
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Faulder v. Johnson
(2×)
we conclude that appellant has failed to show that executing him after fifteen years on death row, during which time he faced at least seven execution dates, would constitute cruel and unusual punishment
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
(2×)
See, e.g., Stafford v. Ward, 59 F.3d 1025 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1173 , 115 S.Ct. 2640 , 132 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995); Turner v. Jabe, 58 F.3d 924 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1136 , 115 S.Ct. 2019 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1995); McKenzie v. Day, 57 F.3d 1461 (9th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See, e.g., Stafford v. Ward, 59 F.3d 1025 (10th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 2640 , 132 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995); Turner v. Jabe, 58 F.3d 924 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2019 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1995); McKenzie v. Day, 57 F.3d 1461 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1840 , 131 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6279, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,338, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,498 Raquel Alvarado Sylvia Beadleston Anne Collett Roger Litwin Gerry Litwin Manuel Salazar v. City of San Jose, a California Municipal Corporation Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose
See also Peloza, 37 F.3d at 521 ("neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit, has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are 'religions' for Establishment Clause purposes."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2640 , 132 L.Ed.2d 878 (1995). 3 See Malnak II, 592 F.2d at 210 (Adams, J., concurring) (cautioning that the indicia should not be regarded as a final "test" for religion) 4 Plaintiffs include allusions to Native American religions as part of their New Age argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Champion
See, e.g., Stafford v. State, 899 P.2d 657, 659 (Okla.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 2640 (1995); Smith v. State, 878 P.2d 375, 377 (Okla.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 673 (1994); Steele, 11 F.3d at 1522 (noting that the Oklahoma court has "stated clearly that section 1086 'strictly' prohibits raising issues that could have been raised before, even issues involving fundamental, constitutional rights").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarado v. City of San Jose
See also Peloza, 37 F.3d at 521 ("neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit, has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are 'religions' for Establishment Clause purposes.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2640 , 132 L.Ed.2d 878 (1995). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stafford
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 95-5029 (A-12).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (2)
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Breyer, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.