green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McWilliams v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
See McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 982 (Ala. Crim.App.1991), aff'd in part, remanded in part sub nom., Ex parte McWilliams, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala.1993), on remand to sub nom., McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 1025 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), opinion after remand, 666 So.2d 89 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd sub nom., Ex parte McWilliams, 666 So.2d 90 (Ala.1995), cert. denied sub nom., McWilliams v. Alabama, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S.Ct. 723 , 133 L.Ed.2d 675 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerry Devane Bryant v. State of Alabama.
See McWilliams v. State , 640 So.2d 982 , 997 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991), aff'd in part, remanded on other grounds in part, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala. 1993), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. State
(2×)
See McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 982, 997 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), aff'd in part, remanded on other grounds in part, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala.1993), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S.Ct. 723 , 133 L.Ed.2d 675 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
McGriff v. State
See McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 982, 1001 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), aff'd in pertinent part, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala.1993), on remand, 640 So.2d 1025 (Ala.Crim.App.), after remand, 666 So.2d 89 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 666 So.2d 90 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S.Ct. 723 , 133 L.Ed.2d 675 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ray v. State
See Ex parte McWilliams , 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala. 1993), aff'd, 666 So.2d 90 (Ala. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 (1996); Smith v. State , 698 So.2d 189 (Ala.Crim.App. 1996), aff'd, 698 So.2d 219 (Ala.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 957 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
McGriff v. State
See McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 982, 1001 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), aff'd in pertinent part, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala.1993), on remand, 640 So.2d 1025 (Ala.Crim.App.), after remand, 666 So.2d 89 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 666 So.2d 90 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S.Ct. 723 , 133 L.Ed.2d 675 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See People v. Beeler, 891 P.2d 153, 167-68 (Cal. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 (1996) (concluding that the trial court has wide discretion in determining whether sufficient foundation has been laid to qualify evidence as a business record).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See McWilliams v. State, 640 So.2d 982, 1002 (Ala.Cr.App.1991) (the appellant was not denied due process by the prosecutor's comment that "the evidence presented concerning the appellant's mental state indicated not that he was mentally ill, but rather that he was simply mean" because "[t]his argument was based on the report from the lunacy commission stating that the appellant did not have a mental defect, *935 but rather had a character defect and repercussions from that defect"), aff'd in pertinent part, 640 So.2d 1015 (Ala.1993), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S.Ct. 723 , 133 L.Ed.2d 67…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schiappa
McCormick, Evidence (4th Ed. 1992) § 253, p. 133 (if declarant’s forgetfulness is only partial, it is appropriate to supplement declarant’s testimony with hearsay testimony to extent required); see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Santiago, 541 Pa. 188, 199 , 662 A.2d 610 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1053 , 116 S. Ct. 722 , 133 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Santiago
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 95-6469.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1996.
Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.