Barton v. United States, 516 U.S. 1082 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Barton v. United States, 516 U.S. 1082 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc. (txed, 2005-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.
E.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bell, 367 F.3d 452 , 467 n. 6 (5th Cir.2004) (“[I]f the Confrontation Clause is not implicated and the concern is only whether the statement is within the hearsay exception, the district court can properly consider any corroborating circumstances ....”) (citing United States v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1493 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 , 116 S.Ct. 794 , 133 L.Ed.2d 742 (1996)); see also Larez v. Los Angeles, 946 F.2d 630 , 643-44 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that where three different, independent newspaper articles corroborated a fact, sufficient guarantees of tr…
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Gregory Lambros
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lambros, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Gregory Lambros
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lambros, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 , 116 S.Ct. 796 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Garcia
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1488-89 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1064 (1996), and cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Doran Dee Robinson, Also Known as Dee Robinson
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: accord · confidence high
Furthermore, the District Court’s failure to specifically find Robinson’s false statements to be willful was a “failure in form alone, insufficient to warrant remand.” United States v. Taylor, 207 F.3d 452, 455 (8th Cir.2000) (reviewing record and concluding that false trial testimony was willful after district court failed to make explicit willfulness finding); accord United States v. Lambros, 65 F.3d 698, 702 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 , 116 S.Ct. 796 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. King
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 562-63 (10th Cir.1995) (considering, inter alia, defendant's statements in plea agreement and change of plea proceedings in concluding that the object of the charged conspiracy was to distribute cocaine base rather than cocaine powder), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 , 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barton
v.
United States
No. 95-7039.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1996.
516 U.S. 1082
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.