green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Turner v. State
No. 73,204, delivered March 7, 2001) (op. on reh’g) (unpublished) (improper for prosecution during closing jury arguments to inform the jury that a life-sentenced defendant could “walk the streets” in less time than what current law provided because of possible future legislative changes to the parole laws); but see Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d at 838 , 849 n. 16 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re The Adoption Of: M.j.w.
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 616 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995) (an issue is moot if this court can no longer provide effective relief). 18 No. 50758-7-II 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re The Marriage Of: Rosablanca Beinhauer v. Mark Beinhauer
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 616 , 888 P.2d 1105 (explaining that an issue is moot if we can no longer provide effective relief), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995). 15 No. 51164-9-II with.10 Br. of Resp’t at 13.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jarvis v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.
If the agency fails to make a timely determination, the requester constructively exhausts his administrative remedies and may seek judicial review without first having to pursue an administrative appeal. 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(C) ; see Pollack v. Dep't of Justice , 49 F.3d 115 , 118-19 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995) ; Waldner v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 981 F.Supp.2d 14 , 16-17 (D.D.C. 2013), aff'd , No. 13-5350, 2014 WL 3014045 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jarvis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
If the agency fails to make a timely determination, the requester constructively exhausts his administrative remedies and may seek judicial review without first having to pursue an administrative appeal. 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(C); see Pollack v. Dep’t of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 118-19 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995); Waldner v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 981 F. Supp. 2d 14, 16-17 (D.D.C. 2013), aff’d, No. 13-5350, 2014 WL 3014045 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Washington v. Patrick Wade Newman
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 629 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995); Eggert v. Ford, 21 Wn.2d 152, 160-61 , 150 P.2d 719 (1944) (holding there “may be a better policy than that which the legislature has seen fit to adopt; but a discussion of that matter has no place here, since the court has no legislative power, but is strictly limited to enforcing the law as it finds it”). 4 No. 47249-0-II We remand for the trial court to consider Newman’s current and future ability to pay discretionary LFOs.3 A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not …
discussed
Cited "see"
Espinoza v. Department of Justice
See Rosenberg v. U.S. Dep’t of Immig. and Customs Enforcement, 954 F.Supp.2d 1, 10 (D.D.C.2013) (“The fact that a fee request was made after the [p]laintiff commenced litigation does not excuse the [p]laintiff from paying the requested fees.”) (citing Pollack v. Dep’t of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995)) (other citations omitted). *244 In the January 2, 2013 fee assessment letter, EOUSA informed plaintiff that his request would be closed if he failed to pay the fees and that he could appeal the decision to OIP.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas Lynn Kirk v. State
(2×)
See Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 854-55 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995); Roberson v. State, 113 S.W.3d 381, 384 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Seattle v. Clewis
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 616 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995). ¶13 Clewis next argues the trial court abused its discretion on February 12, 2008, by continuing the case until 1:30 to give the City more time to persuade the witness to overcome her fear of coming to court.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Seattle v. Clewis
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 616 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. *452 denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995). ¶ 13 Clewis next argues the trial court abused its discretion on February 12, 2008, by continuing the case until 1:30 to give the City more time to persuade the witness to overcome her fear of coming to court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Department of Justice
See Pollack v. Dep’t of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995); Trueblood, 943 F.Supp. at 68-69. i. Neither the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Nor the Department of State Received a FOIA or Privacy Act Request From Plaintiff Defendants argue that plaintiff cannot maintain his claims against the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) and the United States Department of State because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue v. State
See Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 857-72 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995) (explaining how minimum parole eligibility could be considered relevant mitigating evidence). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spencer
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 616-17 , 888 P.2d 1105 (purely academic discussions of moot issues are inappropriate), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995); State v. Jennings, 111 Wash. App. 54 , 44 P.3d 1 (2002) (an element omitted from, or misstated in, a jury instruction, is harmless if that element is supported by uncontroverted evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Spencer
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 616-17 , 888 P.2d 1105 (purely academic discussions of moot issues are inappropriate), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995); State v. Jennings, 111 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re M.A.H.
See Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 847-48 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995); Schneider v. State, 951 S.W.2d 856, 861-62 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1997, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see"
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Department of Revenue
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570 , 587 n.12, 888 P.2d 1105 (writing justice whose dissenting views in prior case were not accepted by majority of the court was bound by doctrine of stare decisis to accede to the view of the majority on that issue in subsequent case), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S. Ct. 131 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. CNH
See RCW 46.01.040(13) and RCW 46.20.161 (the Department of Licensing is vested with all powers with respect to driver's licenses, which includes recording drivers' birthdates because that information must be stated on licenses). [12] See Monson, 113 Wash.2d at 847 , 784 P.2d 485 . [13] State v. Green, 94 Wash.2d 216, 221 , 616 P.2d 628 (1980), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2788 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). [14] State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 597 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995). [15] Gentry, 125 Wash.2d at 597…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowles v. Berge
See Lostutter v. Peters, 50 F.3d 392, 395 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995); Buelow v. Dickey, 847 F.2d 420, 425 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1032 , 109 S.Ct. 1168 , 103 L.Ed.2d 227 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ludwig v. State
See Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 634 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995); State v. Kron, 63 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Compare United 2 States v. Meling, 47 F.3d 1546, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1995) cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995) with 3 United States v. Jackson, 2022 WL 331687 , at *1 (9th Cir. Feb. 3, 2022). 4 To illustrate, in United States v. Meling, the Ninth Circuit found that the district court did 5 not abuse its discretion in admitting lay testimony of a 911 operator and paramedic regarding 6 whether the defendant was faking grief at the time of making the call, in a trial against a husband 7 accused of poisoning his wife. 47 F.3d at 1156-57 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Elmore
See also State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 602-03 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995) (predicate crime need not be identified). ¶ 86 Neither Jones or Schad dictates a different result.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Personal Restraint of Elmore
See also State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 602-03 , 888 P.2d 1105 (predicate crime need not be identified), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 (1995). ¶86 Neither Jones nor Schad dictates a different result.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newbury v. State
See Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 , 114 S.Ct. 2187, 2200-01 , 129 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (when prosecution puts a defendant's future dangerousness at issue, due process requires allowing the defendant to bring his parole ineligibility to the jury’s attention by way of argument by defense counsel or an instruction from the court); compare Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838 , 851 n. 19, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995) (distinguishing the Simmons future-dangerousness concept from the Texas future-dangerousness concept).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pitzer v. Union Bank of California
(2×)
RAP 2.5(a); see also State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 616 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995) (issue involving compliance with procedural rule may not be raised for first time on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rojas v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Collier v. State, 959 S.W.2d 621, 623-24 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), pet. for cert. filed (U.S. May 12, 1998) (No. 97-9054); Eldridge v. State, 940 S.W.2d 646, 651 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); see also Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Crim.App.) (plurality op.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995) and Broxton v. State, 909 S.W.2d 912, 919 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (adopting reasoning in Smith plurality opinion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Detention of Gaff
See, e.g., State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570, 645-47 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S. Ct. 131 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gaff
See, e.g., State v. Gentry, 125 Wash.2d 570, 645-47 , 888 P.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raby v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Cr.App.1995)(plurality opinion), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995); Morris v. State, 940 S.W.2d 610 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2461 , 138 L.Ed.2d 218 (1997).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Colburn v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 849 (Tex.Crim.App.)(Texas Constitution prohibits jury consideration of parole during sentencing phase of capital murder trial unless legislature enacts laws to contrary), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gruber
See United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1354 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 342 (1988); see also United States v. Meling, 47 F.3d 1546, 1551 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 79 (1995); United States v. Biaggi, 853 F.2d 89, 95 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1052 , 109 S.Ct. 1312 , 103 L.Ed.2d 581 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGinn v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Cr.App.1995)(plurality opinion), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 131 , 133 L.Ed.2d 80 (1995); Morris v. State, 940 S.W.2d 610 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 2461 , 138 L.Ed.2d 218 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 94-9585.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.