green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald B. Palmer v. Nakaysone Julie Palmer
See id. (citing Metzger v. Sebek, 892 S.W.2d 20, 55 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, writ denied), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 868 (1995)); see also In re Office of Att’y Gen. of Tex., 215 S.W.3d 913, 915 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, orig. proceeding) (explaining why contempt judgments are not appealable and must be attacked by petition for writ of habeas corpus or for writ of mandamus); cf. Ex parte Casey, 944 S.W.2d 18, 19, 21 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, orig. proceeding) (granting relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus with regard to trial court’s contempt order on…
cited
Cited "see"
Victore Insurance Co. v. City of Bowie
See Metzger v. Sebek, 892 S.W.2d 20, 42 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, writ denied), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 868 , 116 S.Ct. 186 , 133 L.Ed.2d 124 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jenkins
(2×)
See Ferris v. State, 355 Md. 356, 364, 378-79 , 735 A.2d 491 (1999) (concluding that officer improperly subjected motorist to second seizure when, after handing him ticket and returning his license, he asked him to step out of car at night on shoulder of highway to answer questions about use and possession of narcotics without first advising him that he was free to depart); accord State v. Story, 53 Conn.App. 733, 745-47 , 732 A.2d 785 ( Hennessy, J., dissenting) (concluding that traffic stop had ended after trooper returned defendant's identification and issued ticket, and that request for de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mickey v. Mickey
(2×)
See, e.g., Kestler v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Retirement System, 48 F.3d 800 , 804 (4th Cir.) (disability retirement benefits do not vest until date of disability), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 868 , 116 S.Ct. 186 , 133 L.Ed.2d 124 (1995); Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. Phoenix Police Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Berberena
The officers were justified in stopping defendants’ vehicle for a traffic violation, but in the absence of any suspicious circumstances other than allegedly nervous behavior of a minimal and equivocal nature, the police did not have a founded suspicion that criminality was afoot sufficient to justify their clearly accusatory inquiry and their request for consent to search the vehicle’s trunk where the weapon was recovered (see, People v Barreras, 253 AD2d 369 ; see also, People v Banks, 85 NY2d 558 , cert denied 516 US 868 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lozano
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-153.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.