green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 9×
14.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Charles Jerome Verdine v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
officers may presume that a person is at home at certain times of the day
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re: Tmi Litigation Lori Dolan Joseph Gaughan Ronald Ward Estate of Pearl Hickernell Kenneth Putt Estate of Ethelda Hilt Paula Obercash Jolene Peterson Estate of Gary Villella Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7623 in Re: Tmi Litigation All Except Lori Dolan, Joseph Gaughan, Ronald Ward, Estate of Pearl Hickernell, Kenneth Putt, Estate of Ethelda Hilt, Paula Obercash, Jolene Peterson, Estate of Gary Villella and Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7624 in Re: Tmi Litigation
omething doesn't become scientific knowledge' just because it's uttered by a scientist; nor can an expert's self-serving assertion that his conclusions were derived by the scientific method' be deemed conclusive....
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re: TMI Litigation
omething doesn't become 'scientific knowledge' just because it's uttered by a scientist; nor can an expert's self-serving assertion that his conclusions were 'derived by the scientific method' be deemed conclusive....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. DiBenedetto
officers may presume that a person is at home at certain times of the day
cited
Cited "see"
VC Management, LLC v. Reliastar Life Insurance Co.
See Gates v. Victor Fine Foods, 54 F.3d 1457, 1466 (9th Cir.1995), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 187 , 133 L.Ed.2d 124 (1995) (refusing to expand waiver to encompass unrelated action).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Trujillo
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F3d 1311, 1317 (9th Cir), cert den, 516 US 869 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wagoner v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 , 1319 & n. 11 (9th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) (noting that the key under Daubert is whether "a recognized minority” accepts a theory or methodology as valid). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
Pritchard v. Dow Agro Sciences
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1320 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995); see also In re W.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pete Marin III v. State
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. , 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S. Ct. 189 (1995); Jordan v. State , 928 S.W.2d 550, 554 (Tex. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
McConaghy v. Sequa Corp.
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 , 1319 n. 10 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995); see also G.
cited
Cited "see"
Coalition for Long Point Preservation v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
See id. (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 , 1316 (9th Cir.1995) (on remand), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995)).
cited
Cited "see"
Coalition for Long Point Preservation and Mr. and Mrs. William Sutton v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Long Point Partners, L.L.P.
See id. (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. , 43 F.3d 1311 , 1316 (9th Cir. 1995) (on remand), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S. Ct. 189 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Coalition for Long Point Preservation and Mr. and Mrs. William Sutton v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Long Point Partners, L.L.P.
See id. (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 17 1311, 1316 (9th Cir. 1995) (on remand), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S. Ct. 189 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newton v. Roche Laboratories, Inc.
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869, 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) (“One very significant fact to be considered is whether the experts are proposing to testify about matters growing naturally and directly out of research they have conducted independent of the litigation, or whether they have developed their opinions expressly for purposes of testifying.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray
“While probable cause itself is a relatively low threshold of proof, it is a higher standard than ‘reasonable belief, which is, as everyone agrees, the appropriate standard.” Valdez v. McPheters, 172 F.3d at 1227 n. 5 (citation omitted). “[T]he officers’ assessment need not in fact be correct; rather, they need only ‘reasonably believe’ that the suspect resides at the dwelling to be searched and is currently present at the dwelling.” United States v. Risse, 83 F.3d 212, 216 (8th Cir.1996) (citations omitted); see Valdez, 172 F.3d at 1225 . “‘The facts and circumstances with…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Meindl
In Payton , the Supreme Court also decided that “an arrest warrant founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to enter a dwelling in which the suspect lives when there is reason to believe the suspect is within.” 445 U.S. at 603-04 , 100 S.Ct. 1371 . “ ‘Because an arrest warrant authorizes the police to deprive a person of his liberty, it necessarily also authorizes a limited invasion of that person’s privacy interest when it is necessary to arrest him in his home.’ ” Valdez v. McPheters, 172 F.3d 1220, 1224 (10th Cir.1999) (quoting Steagald v. Uni…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Lovelock
Accord United States v. Magluta, 44 F.3d 1530, 1535 (11th Cir.) (reversing grant of motion to suppress, stating that “in order for law enforcement officials to enter a residence to execute an arrest warrant for a resident of the premises, the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the law enforcement agents, when viewed in the totality, must warrant a reasonable belief that the location to be searched is the suspect’s dwelling, and that the suspect is within the residence at the time of entry”), cert. denied 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Center
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) (proceedings after remand) (where opposing party raises a material dispute regarding admissibility of expert scientific evidence, court must hold a hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 , 1316 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) (party presenting expert must show that expert’s findings are based on sound scientific method).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1997
See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1315 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) 4 We have recently held that the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert did overrule Brown's per se prohibition against unstipulated polygraph evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Church of the Gardens v. Quality Loan Services Corporation
Evid. 702(a)); see also Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 10 (“Daubert II”), 43 F.3d 1311 , 1315 (9th Cir. 1995) (relevant evidence is that which “logically 11 advances a material aspect of the proposing party’s case”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995). 12 Expert testimony is reliable if it is “based on sufficient facts or data,” “is the product of 13 reliable principles and methods,” and “reflects a reliable application of the principles and 14 methods to the facts of the case.” Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Qualey v. Pierce County
Evid. 702(a)); see also Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 8 (“Daubert II”), 43 F.3d 1311 , 1315 (9th Cir. 1995) (relevant evidence is that which “logically 9 advances a material aspect of the proposing party’s case”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995). 10 Expert testimony is reliable if it is “based on sufficient facts or data,” “is the product of 11 reliable principles and methods,” and “reflects a reliable application of the principles and 12 methods to the facts of the case.” Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strandquist v. Washington State Department of Health and Human Services
Evid. 702(a)); see also Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 4 (“Daubert II”), 43 F.3d 1311 , 1315 (9th Cir. 1995) (relevant evidence is that which “logically 5 advances a material aspect of the proposing party’s case”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995). 6 Expert testimony is reliable if it is “based on sufficient facts or data,” “is the product of 7 reliable principles and methods,” and “reflects a reliable application of the principles and 8 methods to the facts of the case.” Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Northwest Distributors Inc v. Four Roses Distillery LLC
Evid. 702(a)); see also Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 19 (“Daubert II”), 43 F.3d 1311 , 1315 (9th Cir. 1995) (relevant evidence is that which “logically 20 advances a material aspect of the proposing party’s case”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995). 21 Expert testimony is reliable if it is “based on sufficient facts or data,” “is the product of 22 reliable principles and methods,” and “reflects a reliable application of the principles and 23 methods to the facts of the case.” Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deavers v. Martin
However, as this implication is drawn not from her express argument but instead her declaration she will not address Martin’s qualified immunity defense because “[t]here was a clear constitutional violation here,” the Court is left with an underdeveloped argument as to why qualified immunity should not apply. 21 Circuit, in interpreting Payton, settled on a two-part analysis for determining whether police entry into a private residence was lawful: “(1) whether there is reason to believe that the location is the defendant's residence, and (2) whether or not there was a ‘reasonable bel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Downey
(See People v. Zapien (1993) 4 Cal.4th 929, 989 [ 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 122 , 846 P.2d 704 ].) To borrow from the District of Columbia Circuit’s observation, “[w]e think it more likely . . . that the Supreme Court in Payton used a phrase other than ‘probable cause’ because it meant something other than ‘probable cause.’ ” (U.S. v. Thomas, supra, 429 F.3d at p. 286 ; see also U.S. v. Magluta, supra, 44 F.3d at p. 1534 [“[t]he strongest support for a lesser burden than probable cause remains the text of Payton , and what we must assume was a conscious effort on the part of the Supreme C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duran v. State
(2×)
Circuit's observation, "We think it more likely ... that the Supreme Court in Pay-ton used a phrase other than 'probable cause' because it meant something other than 'probable cause."" Thomas, 429 F.3d at 286 ; see also United States v. Magluta, 44 F.3d 1530, 1534 (11th Cir.1995) ("The strongest support for a lesser burden than probable cause remains the text of Payton, and what we must assume was a conscious effort on the part of the Supreme Court in choosing the verbal formulation of 'reason to believe' over that of 'probable cause.' "), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson v. Quarterman
May field and Allen in 2008. 16 Finders of fact are cautioned to consider the possible bias of an expert witness “including any bias you may infer from evidence that the expert witness has been or will be paid for reviewing the case and testifying, or from evidence that he testifies regularly as an expert witness and his income from such testimony represents a significant portion of his income.” Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions—Civil Cases, Pattern Instruction 2.19, pg. 23 (2006); see also Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1317 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denie…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.
See, e.g., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 , 1317 n. 4 (9th Cir.) (Kozinski, J.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell Brown
Fed.R.Evid. 702; see, e.g., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 43 F.3d 1311, 1316 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) CDaubert II).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Fed.R.Evid. 702; see, e.g., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 43 F.3d 1311, 1316 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995) (Daubert II). 9.In challenging plaintiffs proposed expert testimony, defendant is not required to come forward with “scientific evidence” negating plaintiffs claims.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re 68 West 127 Street, LLC
In re AMC Realty Corp., 270 B.R. 132, 140-41 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2001); see also In re Trident Assoc., Ltd., 52 F.3d 127 , 131 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 188 , 133 L.Ed.2d 125 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wehling v. Sandoz Pharmaceutica
See, e.g., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morgan v. State
United States v. Lauter, 57 F.3d 212, 215 (2d Cir.1995); see also United States v. Magluta, 44 F.3d 1530, 1535 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 , 116 S.Ct. 189 , 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995)(emphasis added).
Florio et ux.
v.
Skorepa
v.
Skorepa
No. 95-185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.