green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States. v. Zayac
See Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River‐Black River Regulating Dist., 673 F.3d 84, 107 (2d Cir. 2012) (ʺIt is a settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.ʺ (quoting Tolbert v. Queens Coll., 242 F.3d 58 , 75 (2d Cir. 2001))). 10 11‐4900 United States. v. Zayac lead to acquittal, and the theory is not effectively presented elsewhere in the charge.ʹʺ United States v. Kerley, 544 F.3d 172, 177 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. Doyle, 130 F.3d 523, 540 (2d Cir. 1997)), cert…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zayac
“A defendant is entitled to an instruction on an affirmative defense only if the defense has ‘a foundation in the evidence.’ ” United States v. Gonzalez, 407 F.3d 118, 122 (2d Cir.2005) (quoting United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 704 (2d Cir.1994) (internal quotation marks omitted)); accord United States v. Hurtado, 47 F.3d 577, 584 (2d Cir.) (“A defense theory must be charged so long as it has some foundation in the proof, no matter how tenuous that defense may appear to the trial court.” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 903 , 116 S.Ct. 266 , 133 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo D. Dawson
See United States v. Hurtado, 47 F.3d 577, 581 (2d Cir.) (even if defendant is made to wear prison clothes at trial, this constitutional error is subject to harmless-error analysis), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 903 , 116 S.Ct. 266 , 133 L.Ed.2d 188 (1995); cf. United States v. Grady, 997 F.2d 421, 424 (8th Cir.) (on facts very similar to Mr. Akbar’s, *618 concluding under plain-error standard of review that defendant was not denied fair trial), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 958 , 114 S.Ct. 416 , 126 L.Ed.2d 363 (1993).
examined
Cited "see"
Sergent v. City of Charleston
(4×)
See U.S. v. Thomas, 55 F.3d 144 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, Thomas v. U.S., 516 U.S. 903 , 116 S.Ct. 266 , 133 L.Ed.2d 189 (1995). [2] On motion of the appellant, trial against Thomas and McGrier was stayed pending this appeal. [3] The area around Cutlips Motor Inn had been secured by additional police units consisting of at least eight officers. [4] Officer White had assisted in securing the area around Cutlips Motor Inn. [5] In his brief to this Court, the appellant lists as one of his assignments of error that "[t]he Court ignored substantial evidence that conflicts with the Court's findi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Borda
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1150, 1157-61 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 903 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rollack
See United States v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1150, 1156 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 903 , 116 S.Ct. 266 , 133 L.Ed.2d 188 (1995) (citing United States v. Bailey, 990 F.2d 119, 122 (4th Cir.1993)); United States v. Loayza, 107 F.3d 257, 264 (4th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gruber
Id. at 236 ; see United States v. Maxim, 55 F.3d 394, 397 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 903 , 116 S.Ct. 265 , 133 L.Ed.2d 188 (1995); United States v. Curry, 911 F.2d 72, 75 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1094 , 111 S.Ct. 980 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1065 (1991); United States v. Macklin, 902 F.2d 1320 , 1324 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom.
Maxim
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-5666.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.