green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment imposes a substantive limit on the size of punitive damages awards”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Axen v. American Home Products Corp.
the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment imposes a substantive limit on the size of punitive damages awards
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. J. D. S.
R., 239 Or App 576, 582 , 244 P3d 916 (2010) (evaluating whether a “rational trier of fact could have found that there was clear and convincing evidence that appellant was a danger to herself’); see Oberg v. Honda Motor Co., 320 Or 544, 553 , 888 P2d 8 (1995), cert den, 517 US 1219 (1996) (reviewing a punitive damages award to determine if the plaintiff presented evidence that permitted a factfinder to conclude, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendants acted with “wanton disregard for the health and safety of others”); Cunningham, 320 Or at 63 (evaluating the sufficiency o…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. JDS
State v. D.R., 239 Or.App. 576, 582 , 244 P.3d 916 (2010) (evaluating whether a "rational trier of fact could have found that there was clear and convincing evidence that appellant was a danger to herself"); see Oberg v. Honda Motor Co., 320 Or. 544, 553 , 888 P.2d 8 (1995), cert. den., 517 U.S. 1219 , 116 S.Ct. 1847 , 134 L.Ed.2d 948 (1996) (reviewing a punitive damages award to determine if the plaintiff presented evidence that permitted a factfinder to conclude, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendants acted with "wanton disregard for the health and safety of others"); Cunningh…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.
The legislature has codified the Supreme Court’s statement of the nature of that review: “If an award of punitive damages is made by a jury, the court shall review the award to determine whether the award is within the range of damages that a rational juror *61 would be entitled to award based on the record as a whole, viewing the statutory and common-law factors that allow an award of punitive damages for the specific type of claim at issue in the proceeding.” ORS 18.537(2); see Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc., 331 Or 537 , 551 n 10, 17 P3d 473 (2001) (stating that ORS 18.537(2) codifie…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.
See Murray v. Laborers Union Local No. 324, 55 F.3d 1445 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1219 , 116 S.Ct. 1847 , 134 L.Ed.2d 948 (1996) (750 to 1); Pickering v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 265 Ill.App.3d 806 , 203 Ill.Dec. 1 , 638 N.E.2d 1127 (1994), appeal denied, 158 Ill.2d 564 , 206 Ill.Dec. 845 , 645 N.E.2d 1367 (1994), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2496 , 135 L.Ed.2d 188 (1996) (19 to 1).
cited
Cited "see"
Patriot Party Alghny v. Alghny Cty Dept
See McKenna v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 517 U.S. 1219 , 116 S.Ct. 1846 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reform Party of Allegheny County v. Allegheny County Department of Elections Mark Wolosik, Director of the Allegheny County Department of Elections
(2×)
See McKenna v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 517 U.S. 1219 , 116 S.Ct. 1846 , 134 L.Ed.2d 947 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ogozaly v. American Honda Motor Co.
See e.g., Oberg v. Honda Motor Co. Ltd, 320 Or. 544, 553-55, 888 P.2d 8, 13 (Or. 1995) (punitive damages recoverable since the plaintiff introduced evidence that the defendants knew for many years prior to the plaintiff’s ATV accident that the ATV model which the plaintiff was operating was prone to roll-over accidents and that “an agency of the United States government undertook to investigate the safety of ATVs.”), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1219 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Sisk
No. 95-8796.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.