green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
“proof by the preponderance of evidence means that it is sufficient to persuade the finder of fact that the proposition is more likely true than not. clear and convincing evidence is a higher standard requiring a high probability of success.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kelley v. Locke (In Re Kelley)
proof by the preponderance of evidence means that it is sufficient to persuade the finder of fact that the proposition is more likely true than not. clear and convincing evidence is a higher standard requiring a high probability of success.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Clarence Thomas Cummings and Pamela K. Cummings
The bankruptcy court also based its ruling, in 26 large part, on Thomas’s testimony at trial, which it found 27 unconvincing. 28 “Proof by the preponderance of the evidence means that it is 19 1 sufficient to persuade the finder of fact that the proposition is 2 more likely true than not.” United States v. Arnold & Baker 3 Farms (In re Arnold & Baker Farms), 177 B.R. 648, 654 (9th Cir. 4 BAP 1994), aff’d 85 F.3d 1415 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied sub 5 nom., Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States, 519 U.S. 1054 6 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Farm Credit of Florida, ACA v. Sugarleaf Timber, LLC
See Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States (In re Arnold & Baker Farms), 85 F.3d 1415, 1421 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Verhoeven Ex Rel. Verhoeven v. Brunswick School Committee
See In re Arnold & Baker Farms, 85 F.3d 1415, 1419 (9th Cir.1996) (“Mootness is a jurisdictional issue which we review de novo.”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997); F.E.R. v. Valdez, 58 F.3d 1530, 1532-33 (10th Cir.1995) (“We review the question of mootness de novo as a matter of federal jurisdiction.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Mirchou
See, e.g. , Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States (In re Arnold & Baker Farms) , 85 F.3d 1415 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997) (denying confirmation of plan where evidence did not support finding that replacement real property collateral provided indubitable equivalent of allowed secured claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Mohave Agrarian Grp., LLC
See, e.g. , Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States (In re Arnold & Baker Farms) , 85 F.3d 1415 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997) (denying confirmation of plan where evidence did not support finding that replacement real property collateral provided indubitable equivalent of allowed secured claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
2
Depʹt of Prob., 115 F.3d 1068 , 1075‐ 76 (2d Cir. 1997), reaffʹd after remand, 173 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1003 (1999))); see also id. at 407 (citing Griffin v. Coughlin, 673 N.E.2d 98, 103 , 88 N.Y.2d 674, 683 , 649 N.Y.S.2d 903, 908 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 (1997) (holding that the A.A. materials in the record ʺdemonstrate[d] beyond peradventure that doctrinally and as actually practiced in the 12‐step methodology, adherence to the A.A. fellowship entails engagement in religious activity and religious proselytizationʺ)). 34 16‐1271 Fratello v. Arc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fratello v. Archdiocese of New York
Depʹt of Prob., 115 F.3d 1068 , 1075‐ 76 (2d Cir. 1997), reaffʹd after remand, 173 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1003 (1999))); see also id. at 407 (citing Griffin v. Coughlin, 673 N.E.2d 98, 103 , 88 N.Y.2d 674, 683 , 649 N.Y.S.2d 903, 908 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 (1997) (holding that the A.A. materials in the record ʺdemonstrate[d] beyond peradventure that doctrinally and as actually practiced in the 12‐step methodology, adherence to the A.A. fellowship entails engagement in religious activity and religious proselytizationʺ)). 34 16‐1271 Fratello v. Arc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fratello v. Archdiocese of New York
Dep’t of Prob., 115 F.3d 1068, 1075-76 (2d Cir. 1997), reaff’d after remand, 173 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1003 , 120 S.Ct. 495 , 145 L.Ed.2d 382 (1999))); see also id. at 407 (citing Griffin v. Coughlin, 88 N.Y.2d 674, 683 , 649 N.Y.S.2d 903, 908 , 673 N.E.2d 98, 103 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997) (holding that the A.A. materials in the record "demonstrate[d] beyond peradventure that doctrinally and as actually practiced in the 12-step methodology, adherence to the A,A. fellowship entails engagement in religious activity …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeStefano v. Miller
See, e.g., Griffin v. Coughlin, 88 N.Y.2d 674 , 649 N.Y.S.2d 903 , 673 N.E.2d 98 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 , 117 S.Ct. 681 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997); Warner v. Orange *286 County Dep’t of Probation, 115 F.3d 1068 (2d Cir.1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arias
v.
California
v.
California
No. M-44.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner denied.