discussed Cited "see" Healthcare America v. Bossemeyer See Smith v. CHAMPUS, 97 F.3d 950 , 956 (7th Cir.1996) (determining that where no criteria were given for determining whether a procedure meets the "generally accepted" standard, the meaning of the term was a matter for the insurer's interpretation, "subject to deferential court review"), cert. dismissed, 519 U.S. 1144 , 117 S.Ct. 1027 , 137 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Barakat See United States v. Watts, 515 U.S. 389 , -, 117 S.Ct. 633, 636 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 , reh’g denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1024 , 136 L.Ed.2d 900 (1997); United States v. Frazier, 89 F.3d 1501, 1506 (11th Cir.1996); United States v. Averi, 922 F.2d 765, 766 (11th Cir.1991).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Barakat See United States v. Watts, --- U.S. ----, ---, 117 S. Ct. 633, 636 , reh'g denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S. Ct. 1024 (1997); United States v. Frazier, 89 F.3d 1501, 1506 (11th Cir. 1996); United States v. Averi, 922 F.2d 765, 766 (11th Cir. 1991).