green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. City of New York
(2×)
Defendants also urge the Court to dismiss this claim since Hicks “does not claim that the alleged withholding of evidence, to the extent that it occurred, was the result of intentionally wrongful conduct.” ECF 29 at 21; see United States v. Lemon, 1996 WL 20520 , at *3, 100 F.3d 942 (2d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 146 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz-Graulau
See generally United States v. Manning, 79 F.3d 212, 219 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 147 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996); 6 LaFave, Israel, King & Kerr, Criminal Procedure § 22.1(g) (3d ed.2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
See Wingfield v. Commonwealth, No. 3000-95-2, 1997 WL 147455 , *2 (Va. App. Apr. 1, 1997) (unpublished opinion) (citing United States v. Roulette, 75 F.3d 418, 421-422 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. 853 (1996)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ramos
See State v. Seymour, 140 N.H. 736, 744 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. D'Amario
See United States v. Manning, 79 F.3d 212, 218 (1st Cir.) (reciting standard of review), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 147 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Caldwell v. Ricky Bell, Warden
(2×)
See Caldwell v. State, 917 S.W.2d 662 (Tenn.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 148 , 136 L.Ed.2d 94 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Doucette
See State v. Seymour, 140 N.H. 736, 746 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randy Anderson and James Anderson, Also Known as \Bodine
See United States v. Roulette, 75 F.3d 418, 424 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 147 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randy Anderson
See United States v. Roulette, 75 F.3d 418, 424 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Fischer v. Hooper
See State v. Seymour, 140 N.H. 736, 740-41 , 673 A.2d 786, 790-91 , cert.denied, 117 S. Ct. 146 -47 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Don D. Howard
See United States v. Roulette, 75 F.3d 418, 423 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 , 117 S.Ct. 147 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hennessey
See State v. Seymour, 140 N.H. 736, 743-44 , 673 A.2d 786, 793 , cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 146 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sweeney
“As a general rule, necessity may be found if the expert would advise or testify on a matter directly in issue and the showing of necessity will obviously be strongest if the testimony of an expert is essential to establish a matter in issue or could be conclusive on that issue.” State v. Campbell, 127 N.H. 112, 115-16 (1985) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Manning, 79 F.3d 212, 218 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 (1996) (expert services necessary “when ... proffered expert testimony was pivotal to the indigent defendant’s defense”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Poole
See, e.g., State v. Seymour, 140 N.H. 736, 739, 749 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 853 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Panton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-9368.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.