green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Omicron Capital, LLC. v. OMICRON CAPITAL, LLC.
that neither nor his customers were finally deceived as to a purchasing decision further buttresses the fact that the initial confusion of a retailer does not support a finding of actual confusion.
cited
Cited "see"
Schrader v. Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.
See Riley v. Murdock, 890 F.Supp. 444, 454 (E.D.N.C.1995), aff'd, 83 F.3d 415 , 1996 WL 209613 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 964 , 117 S.Ct. 387 , 136 L.Ed.2d 304 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. City of Cincinnati
See also, Reese v. City of Columbus, 71 F.3d 619 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 964 , 117 S.Ct. 386 , 136 L.Ed.2d 303 (1996). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacIa v. Microsoft Corp.
This is because “in a reverse confusion case, the junior user is not trying to take a. free ride on the recognition value of a strong, senior mark.” McCarthy on Trademarks and *517 Unfair Competition § 23:10 (4th ed.2004); see also Sunenblick v. Harrell, 895 F.Supp. 616, 627-28 (S.D.N.Y.1995), aff'd, 101 F.3d 684 (2d Cir.1996) (unpublished table decision), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 964 , 117 S.Ct. 386 , 136 L.Ed.2d 303 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holland
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1996.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.