green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Varela v. Marshall
See Glenn v. Bartlett, 98 F.3d 721, 724-25 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S.Ct. 1116 , 137 L.Ed.2d 317 (1997). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. McGinnis
Velasquez v. Leonardo, 898 F.2d at 9 ; accord Glenn v. Bartlett, 98 F.3d 721, 724-25 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S.Ct. 1116 , 137 L.Ed.2d 317 (1997); see Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 , 264 n. 10, 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989) (federal habeas court cannot review a claim if a state court explicitly invoked a state procedural bar rule as a separate basis for decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Huckaby
(2×)
See State v. Phidd, 42 Conn. App. 17, 27 , 681 A.2d 310 , cert. denied, 238 Conn. 907 , 679 A.2d 2 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S. Ct. 1115 , 137 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clue v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
In the [habeas] court’s choice among . . . possible remedies, the decisive factor must be the vindi- cation of the [petitioner’s] constitutional rights.’’ (Cita- tions omitted; footnote added; footnote omitted.) Gaines v. Manson, 194 Conn. 510 , 528–29, 481 A.2d 1084 (1984); see also State v. Phidd, 42 Conn. App. 17, 28 , 681 A.2d 310 (‘‘[t]he statutory language ‘dispose of the case as law and justice require’ gives the habeas court the power to conform a remedy to the particular facts’’), cert. denied, 238 Conn. 907 , 679 A.2d 2 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaddah v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
James L. v. Commissioner of Correction, 245 Conn. 132, 148 , 712 A.2d 947 (1998), quoting Gaines v. Manson, 194 Conn. 510, 517-18 , 481 A.2d 1084 (1984) (“[p]roof of unconstitutional impairment of the right to appeal empowers a court to fashion an order conditionally discharging the petitioner or otherwise fashioning the appropriate relief, short of immediate release, to which the petitioner may be entitled” [internal quotation marks omitted]); Fredericks v. Reincke, 152 Conn. 501, 508 , 208 A.2d 756 (1965) (permitting late appeal upon establishment of federal constitutional impairment to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Martin
(2×)
Co., 136 Conn. 234, 236 , 70 A.2d 126 (1949).” Central Connecticut Teachers Federal Credit Union v. Grant, 27 Conn. App. 435, 438 , 606 A.2d 729 (1992); see also State v. Phidd, 42 Conn. App. 17, 31 , 681 A.2d 310 (formal stipulation of facts by parties constitutes judicial admission that should normally be adopted by court deciding case), cert. denied, 238 Conn. 907 , 679 A.2d 2 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S. Ct. 1115 , 137 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. West
The Supreme Court has made clear that the “adequate and independent state *422 ground doctrine applies on federal habeas [review],” such that “an adequate and independent finding of procedural default will bar federal habeas review of the federal claim, unless the habeas petitioner can show cause for the default and prejudice attributable thereto, or demonstrate that failure to consider the federal claim will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.” Har ris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 262 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989) (citations and internal quotations omitted); see also…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tobias v. Portuondo
Procedural Default The Supreme Court has made clear that the “adequate and independent state ground doctrine applies on federal habeas [review],” such that “an adequate and independent finding of procedural default will bar federal habeas review of the federal claim, unless the habeas petitioner can show cause for the default and prejudice attributable thereto, or demonstrate that failure to consider the federal claim will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.” Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 262 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989) (citations & internal quotations omitted…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimes v. Goord
Procedural Default The Supreme Court has made clear that the “adequate and independent state *315 ground doctrine applies on federal habeas [review],” such that “an adequate and independent finding of procedural default will bar federal habeas review of the federal claim, unless the habeas petitioner can show cause for the default and prejudice attributable thereto, or demonstrate that failure to consider the federal claim will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.” Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 262 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989) (citations & internal quotations om…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Baker
References to the shared nationality of defendant and the victim were isolated and not part of a pattern of inflammatory references to race or appeals to racial prejudice (see, People v Dominguez, 275 AD2d 468 ; People v Vargas, 161 AD2d 822 ; see also, People v Glenn, 185 AD2d 84, 90-91 , cert denied 520 US 1108 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond Wray v. Sally B. Johnson, Superintendent, Orleans Correctional Facility
Although the strength of the prosecution’s case “is probably the single most critical factor in .determining whether error was harmless,” Latine v. Mann, 25 F.3d 1162, 1167-68 (2d Cir.1994) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1006 , 115 S.Ct. 1319 , 131 L.Ed.2d 200 (1995); see also Glenn v. Bartlett, 98 F.3d 721, 729 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S.Ct. 1116 , 137 L.Ed.2d 317 (1997), the mere fact that the properly admitted evidence, standing alone, would have been sufficient to support the conviction is not determinative of whether the improperly…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James L. v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
“Proof of unconstitutional impairment of the right to appeal empowers a court to fashion an order conditionally discharging the petitioner or otherwise fashioning the appropriate relief, short of immediate release, to which the petitioner may be entitled.” Id., 517-18; see also State v. Phidd, 42 Conn. App. 17, 27-29 , 681 A.2d 310 , cert. denied, 238 Conn. 907 , 679 A.2d 2 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1108 , 117 S. Ct. 1115 , 137 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phidd
v.
Connecticut
v.
Connecticut
No. 96-7414.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1997.
Published
App. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.