green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“the ada does not require that northwest take action inconsistent with the contractual rights of other workers under a collective bargaining agreement.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
GARDNER v. SEPTA
the ada does not require that northwest take action inconsistent with the contractual rights of other workers under a collective bargaining agreement.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joyner v. State
Accord Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 227 , 686 A.2d 274 (1996) (defendant waived suppression issue by failing to raise it prior to trial), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1146 , 117 S.Ct. 1318 , 137 L.Ed.2d 480 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carroll v. State
Accord Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 227 , 686 A.2d 274 (1996) (defendant waived suppression issue by failing to raise it prior to trial), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1146 , 117 S.Ct 1318 , 137 L.Ed.2d 480 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Payne v. Allen
(2×)
See Payne v. Alabama, 520 U.S. 1146 , 117 S.Ct. 1319 , 137 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holmes v. Marion County Office of Family & Children
See also Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 94 F.3d 1041, 1049 (7th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1146 , 117 S.Ct. 1318 , 137 L.Ed.2d 480 (1997) (noting that the “Senate and House Reports on the ADA clarified that Hardison’s statement that only de minimis costs were required for reasonable accommodation does not apply under the ADA.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Willis v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 10. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Paul Gomez v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 10. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 34
See, e.g., Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 94 F.3d 1041, 1051 (7th Cir.1996) ("[T]he ADA does not require disabled individuals to be accommodated by sacrificing the collectively bargained, bona fide seniority rights of other employees."), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1146 , 117 S.Ct. 1318 , 137 L.Ed.2d 480 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wheeler
v.
Nevada
v.
Nevada
No. 96-7511.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certio-rari denied.