green
Positive treatment
10.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Parker v. Turpin
But see Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1490 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997) (in deciding prejudicial information claim, court found “no defensible distinction to be made based solely on the source of the information” rather than focusing on the nature of the information itself). 73 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bolden
(2×)
See *624 United States v. Grajales-Montoya, 117 F.3d 356, 363 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1007 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Altmann v. Republic of Austria
(2×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (noting that Landgraf identified statutes that confer or *1201 oust jurisdiction as an example of statutes that generally do not have a retroactive effect), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 189 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Crosier v. Quikey Manufacturing Co., Unpublished Decision (2-28-2001)
See Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc . (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 134 , 151 , certiorari denied (1997), 522 U.S. 1008 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 .
examined
Cited "see"
Clinton K. Lajoie v. S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, No. 98-35919
(3×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 586 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lajoie v. Thompson
(2×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See 114 F.3d 1484, 1494-99 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven White
See United States v. Grajales-Montoya, 117 F.3d 356, 364 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 446 , and cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 586 (1997); United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 835 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 (1996). -4- In accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have reviewed the record for any nonfrivolous issues and have found none.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Weaver v. S. Frank Thompson
(2×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1489 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
examined
Cited "see"
Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden
(3×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 586 (1997). 6 The district court erroneously concluded that the AEDPA applied to this case, and instead of issuing a certificate of probable cause, it issued a certificate of appealability limiting the issues that Dubria could raise. [ER 153-61] As we stated in note 5, supra , because Dubria filed his petition on April 12, 1996, before the April 24, 1996 effective date of the AEDPA, that statute did not apply to Dubria's appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Delgado v. Rice
(2×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1494-96 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saya
(2×)
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1490 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997); Lawson v. Borg, 60 F.3d 608 (9th Cir.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Tolbert v. Page
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Darryl Tolbert v. Glenda Page
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 586 (1997). 4 Batson required the defendant to establish three elements in support of the prima facie case: (1) that the defendant is a member of a cognizable racial group; (2) that the prosecution "has exercised peremptory challenges to remove from the venire members of the defendant's race"; and (3) "that these facts and any other relevant circumstances raise an inference that the prosecutor used that practice to exclude the veniremen from the petit jury on account of their race." Batson, 476 U.S. at 96 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lavonne Roach, United States of America v. Rodney Jackson, United States of America v. Kevin Eagle Tail
See United States v. Grajales-Montoya, 117 F.3d 356, 365 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 446 , 139 L.Ed.2d 382 (1997), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997); United States v. Granados, 962 F.2d 767, 770 (8th Cir.1992).
examined
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. KEATING, Jr., Charles H. Keating, III, Defendants-Appellees
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1492 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) ("Jeffries"), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Scott Keltner
See United States v. Grajales-Montoya, 117 F.3d 356, 363 (8th Cir.) (holding that failure to advance an argument before the district court that a Jencks Act violation occurred results in waiver of the argument on appeal), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 586 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Scott Keltner, United States of America v. Charles Bruce Nabors
See United States v. Grajales-Montoya, 117 F.3d 356, 363 (8th Cir.) (holding that failure to advance an argument before the district court that a Jencks Act violation occurred results in waiver of the argument on appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvarez
See Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1492-93 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stinespring v. Natorp Garden Stores, Inc.
(2×)
See Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc. (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 134, 146-147 , 677 N.E.2d 308, 318-319 , certiorari denied (1997), 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalo v. Moen Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc., 78 Ohio St.3d 134 , 677 N.E.2d 308, 320-29 (Ohio 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997) (discussing public policy exception to employment-at-will doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bartkowiak v. the Pillsbury Company, Unpublished Decision (1-11-2000)
(2×)
See, e.g., Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc. (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 134 , 677 N.E.2d 308 , certiorari denied (1997), 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (holding that an at-will employee who is discharged in violation of the whistleblower statute may maintain a common law cause of action against the employer for termination in violation of public policy); Boyd v. Winton Hills Medical Health Ctr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CERVANTES
Moreover, even the strict doctrine of “law of the case” allows for the revisiting of issues where “controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of law applicable to such issues.” Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155, 168 (1st Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1186 (1997); see also Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1489 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 (1997); Gillig v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., 67 F.3d 586, 590 (6th Cir. 1995); Pierce v. Cook & Co., 518 F.2d 720 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1079 (1976). 6 The First Circuit found the Attorn…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barapind v. Reno
(2×)
See also Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Calderon v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
See Lindh, 117 S.Ct. at 2061 ; see also Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1494 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8959, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,479 Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin v. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, Horace Edwards Kelly, Real Party in Interest
See Lindh, 117 S.Ct. at 2061 ; see also Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1494 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997). 5 From 1992 to 1997, Kelly's proceedings remained in the district court.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth CRANDELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Bill J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellants
Lindh v. Murphy, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997); see also Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barker v. Yukins
See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); see also, Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1500-1501 (9th Cir.) (AEDPA, if applied, would not preclude habeas relief where the state court failed to apply *603 Chapman harmless error standard, rendering its decision contrary to clearly established federal law), petition for cert. denied,-U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 586 , 139 L.Ed.2d 423 (1997); Miller v. Page, No. 96 C 4293, 1997 WL 684988 , at *4 (N.D.Ill.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hays
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-6592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1997.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.