green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodrick Dean Pouncy, Jr
Minn. Stat. § 253D.02, subd. 16; see In re Linehan, 544 N.W.2d 308, 318 (Minn. App. 1996) (Linehan II) (“[T]he statute’s term ‘likely’ requires future misconduct to be ‘highly likely.’”), aff’d, 557 N.W.2d 171 (Minn. 1996), vacated and remanded sub nom., Linehan v. Minnesota, 522 U.S. 1011 (1997), aff’d on remand, 594 N.W.2d 867 (Minn. 1999) (affirming appellant’s civil commitment under SDP statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil
See In re Linehan, 557 N.W.2d 171, 184-86 (Minn.1996) (rejecting argument that antisocial personality disorder is not constitutionally valid basis for commitment), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 1011 , 118 S.Ct. 596 , 139 L.Ed.2d 486 (1997), aff'd on remand, 594 N.W.2d 867 (Minn.1999); Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d at 915 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Civil Commitment of Rannow
See In re Linehan, 557 N.W.2d 167, 169 (Minn.1996) (concluding that sexually-dangerous-person act is facially civil), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 1011 , 118 S.Ct. 596 , 189 L.Ed.2d 486 (1997), aff'd on remand, 594 N.W.2d 867 (Minn.1999); Call v. Gomez, 535 N.W.2d 312, 319-20 (Minn.1995) (holding that commitment under the sexually-psychopathic-personality law is remedial because it is for treatment purposes).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis D. Linehan v. Frank R. Milczark, Sued as Frank Milczark
See Linehan v. Minnesota, 522 U.S. 1011 , 118 S.Ct. 596 , 139 L.Ed.2d 486 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gebser
v.
Lago Vista Independent School District
v.
Lago Vista Independent School District
No. 96-1866.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1997.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 16, 1998. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 13, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March, 13,1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.