green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
STATE OF MISSOURI v. DOUGLAS DWAYNE EUBANKS
the general rule is that when a defendant makes a voluntary judicial admission of fact before the jury, . . . he admission is conclusive on him for the purpose of the case.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carmon
See State v. Richardson, 346 N.C. 520, 534 , 488 S.E.2d 148, 156 (1997) (holding it was incumbent upon the State to explain to the jurors why a third person who defendant alleged to be the perpetrator was eliminated as a suspect), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Singletary
See State v. Page, 346 N.C. 689, 699 , 488 S.E.2d 225, 232 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 (1998); State v. Avery, 315 N.C. 1, 31 , 337 S.E.2d 786, 803 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sines
See State v. Page, 346 N.C. 689 , 488 S.E.2d 225 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Burton
State v. Beal, 966 S.W.2d 9, 14 (Mo.App.1997); see also State v. Roberts, 948 S.W.2d 577, 592 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 118 S.Ct. 711 , 139 L.Ed.2d 652 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sellars
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Page, 346 N.C. 689, 698 , 488 S.E.2d 225, 231 (1997) ("A defendant is entitled to present evidence that a diminished mental capacity not amounting to legal insanity negated his ability to form the specific intent to kill required for a first-degree murder conviction on the basis of premeditation and deliberation."), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 118 S.Ct. 710 , 139 *51 L.Ed.2d 651 (1998); State v. Staten, 172 N.C.App. 673, 685 , 616 S.E.2d 650, 659 ("The defense of diminished capacity neither justifies nor excuses the commission of an offense, but rather negates only the el…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
“Where the presumption of prejudice from the erroneous admission of evidence is overcome by the strength of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, reversal is not mandated.” State v. Beal, 966 S.W.2d 9, 14 (Mo.App.1997); see also Simmons, 944 S.W.2d at 178 , and State v. Roberts, 948 S.W.2d 577, 592 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 118 S.Ct. 711 , 139 L.Ed.2d 652 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bucklew v. State
See also State v. Roberts, 948 S.W.2d 577, 594 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1056 , 118 S.Ct. 711 , 139 L.Ed.2d 652 (1998); State v. Copeland, 928 S.W.2d 828, 843 (Mo. banc 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1126 , 117 S.Ct. 981 , 136 L.Ed.2d 864 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Omawalli
v.
Anderson, Warden
v.
Anderson, Warden
No. 97-6528.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Missouri Court of Appeals (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.