green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Reindl v. CITY OF LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS
(2×)
See Allen v. Muskogee, Okla., 119 F.3d 837, 841-42 (10th Cir.1997) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1148, 118 S.Ct. 1165 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998); Lewis v. Board of Sedgwick County Commissioners, 140 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1132 (D.Kan.2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buchanan Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. Maine
(2×)
Id. (quoting Canton, 489 U.S. at 390 n. 10, 109 S.Ct. 1197 ); see Allen v. Muskogee, 119 F.3d 837 , 843-44 (10th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1165 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998) (expert testimony that city trained its officers to approach armed suicidal, emotionally disturbed individuals and try to disarm them could constitute a failure to train without a pattern of previous violations); but see Robles v. City of Fort Wayne, 113 F.3d 732, 735-36 (7th Cir.1997) (failure to train officers that relevant constitutional standards do not change when they perform off-duty work is ins…
discussed
Cited "see"
Raffaele v. Marrama
(2×)
See Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 890 (1st Cir.1997), cert, denied, Ahmed v. Greemvood, 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1165 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance v. Zang
(2×)
See Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 891 (1st Cir.1997) (“We will find an abuse of discretion [under Rule 60(b) ] only when we are left with a definite and firm conviction that the lower court committed a clear error of judgment ....”), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1165 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hightower v. Vose
See Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 891 (1st Cir.1997) (denial of Rule 60(b) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1148 (1998). -3- We have carefully considered Hightower's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
cited
Cited "see"
Lowery v. University of Houston-Clear Lake
See Travis v. Board of Regents, 122 F.3d 259 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1166 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Emanuel v. SBA
(3×)
See Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 890 (1st Cir. 1997), cert, denied, 118 S.Ct. 1165 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Myers v. Oklahoma County Board Of County Commissioners
See Allen v. Muskogee, 119 F.3d 837 , 841 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 1165 (1998). 21 [A] plaintiff must show (1) the officers exceeded constitutional limitations on the use of force; (2) the use of force arose under circumstances that constitute a usual and recurring situation with which police officers must deal; (3) the inadequate training demonstrates a deliberate indifference on the part of the city towards persons with whom the police officers come into contact, and (4) there is a direct causal link between the constitutional deprivation and the inadequate training. 22 Id. a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Myers v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
See Allen v. Muskogee, 119 F.3d 837, 841 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 1165 (1998). [A] plaintiff must show (1) the officers exceeded constitutional limitations on the use of force; (2) the use of force arose under circumstances that constitute a usual and recurring situation with which police officers must deal; (3) the inadequate training demonstrates a deliberate indifference on the part of the city towards persons with whom the police officers come into contact, and (4) there is a direct causal link between the constitutional deprivation and the inadequate training.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arruda v. Curves International, Inc.
See e.g., Ahmad v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 889 (1st Cir. 1997) (failure to plead predicate acts of fraud with particularity is enough to justify dismissal of a civil RICO claim), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1165 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Molina v. Union Independiente Autentica De La AAA
(2×)
Thus, “[a]s in any other *296 fraud case, the pleader is required to go beyond a showing of fraud and state the time, place and content of the alleged mail and wire communications perpetrating that fraud.” Id. (citation omitted); see also Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 888-89 (1st Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1165 , 140 L.Ed.2d 176 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sythe v. City of Eureka
See also Hyland v. Wonder, 117 F.3d 405, 409 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1148 , 118 S.Ct. 1166 , 140 L.Ed.2d 177 (1998) (Whether a public official is entitled to qualified immunity is a question of law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blaisdell v. Rochester, NH, et al.
See also Ahmed v. Rosenblatt, 118 F.3d 886, 888-89 (1st Cir. 1997) (discussing the essential elements of a viable civil RICO claim and the specific pleading reguirements applicable to such a claim), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 1165 (1998); Camelio v. American Federation, 137 F.3d 666, 670-71 (1st Cir. 1998) (discussing the statutory definition of "extortion" and concluding that, because the plaintiff claimed his injuries resulted exclusively from defendants' unilateral actions, plaintiff's civil RICO claim must fail because defendants did not extort property (i.e., take it from him with his consen…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gill
v.
System Planning Corp.
v.
System Planning Corp.
No. 97-949.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1998.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.