green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Edwards v. Akzo Nobel, Inc.
congress intended erisa 'to occupy fully the field of employee benefit plans and to establish it "as exclusively a federal concern
discussed
Cited "see"
Alberto Manuel Nunez v. Eric Rardin
See Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305, 309 (6th Cir. 1999) (“[A]n inmate cannot simply fail to file a grievance or abandon the process before completion and claim that he has exhausted his remedies or that it is futile for him to do so because his grievance is now time-barred under the regulations.”) (citing Wright v. Morris, 111 F.3d 414 , 417 n.3 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 906 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibson v. City of Cincinnati
See Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305, 309 (6th Cir.1997) (“an inmate cannot simply fail to file a grievance or abandon the process before completion and claim that he has exhausted his remedies. . . .” (emphasis supplied) (citing Wright v. Morris, 111 F.3d 414 , 417 n. 3 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 522 U.S. 906 , 118 S. Ct. 263 , 139 L.Ed.2d 190 (1997)); see also Woodford, 548 U.S. at 90 (“proper exhaustion of administrative remedies . . . ‘means using all steps that the agency holds out. . . .’” (quoting Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1024 (7th Cir. 2002)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Ashland Warden Lemasters
See Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305, 309 (6th Cir. 1999) (“[A]n inmate cannot simply fail to file a grievance or abandon the process before completion and claim that he has exhausted his remedies or that it is futile for him to do so because his grievance is now time-barred under the regulations.”) (citing Wright v. Morris, 111 F.3d 414 , 417 n.3 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 906 , 118 S. Ct. 263 , 139 L.Ed.2d 190 (1997)).
cited
Cited "see"
Horwitz v. L & J.G. Stickley, Inc.
See Criales v. American Airlines, Inc., 105 F.3d 93, 95 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 906 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 190 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elk v. United States
See Coit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLIC, 489 U.S. 561, 579 , 109 S.Ct. 1361 , 103 L.Ed.2d 602 (1989) (requirement must be “explicit”); McGee v. United States, 402 U.S. 479, 483, n. 6 , 91 S.Ct. 1565 , 29 L.Ed.2d 47 (1971) (requirement must derive from a "specific congressional command”); see also Wright v. Morris, 111 F.3d 414, 420-21 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 906 , 118 S.Ct. 263 (1997); Chelette v. Harris, 229 F.3d 684 , 687 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1156 , 121 S.Ct. 1106 , 148 L.Ed.2d 977 (2001); Richard J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern States Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
Co. v Dedeaux, 481 US 41, 47 [1987]), and is “conspicuous for its breadth” (FMC Corp. v Holliday, 498 US 52, 58 [1990]), a state law is found to relate to employee benefit plans if it “refers to or has a connection with covered benefit plans * * * even if the law is not specifically designed to affect such plans, or the effect is only indirect,’ * * * and even if the law is 'consistent with ERISA’s substantive requirements.’ ” (District of Columbia v Greater Washington Bd. of Trade, 506 US 125, 129-130 [1992] [internal citations omitted]; see also, Romney v Lin, 94 F3d 74 , 78 [2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cotton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-5804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.