green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2019–2020 ·
…at a minimum, rule 9(b) requires that a plaintiff set forth the 'who, what, when, where, and how' of the alleged fraud.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Rifle Association of America v. Ackerman McQueen Inc
at a minimum, rule 9(b) requires that a plaintiff set forth the 'who, what, when, where, and how' of the alleged fraud.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lefcourt v. The Health Enrollment Group Inc
at a minimum, rule 9(b) requires that a plaintiff set forth the 'who, what, when, where, and how' of the alleged fraud.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re BP P.L.C. Securities Litigation
a complaint can be long-winded, even prolix, without pleading with particularity. indeed, such a garrulous style is not an uncommon mask for an absence of detail.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Hansen Natural Corp. Securities Litigation
a complaint can be long-winded, even prolix, without pleading with particularity. indeed, such a garrulous style is not an uncommon mask for an absence of detail the amended complaint here, although long, states little with particularity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Biggers (MAG+)
See id. law when he acts with authority possessed by virtue of his employment with the State’” and that ‘“[i]t is firmly established that a defendant in a § 1983 suit acts under color of law when he abuses the position given to him by the State.’” Doc. 5 at 5 (citing Griffin v. City of Opa-Locka, 261 F.3d 1295 , 1303 (11th Cir. 2001) (citing Almand v. DeKalb Cty., Georgia, 103 F.3d 1510, 1513 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 (1997); United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 326 (1941))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. Uni-Pixel, Inc.
See Goldstein v. MCI WorldCom, 340 F.3d 238, 245 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight v. Pugh
See Rooney v. Watson, 101 F.3d 1378, 1381 (11th Cir.1996) (“[A]n inquiry into a governmental entity’s custom or policy is relevant only when a constitutional deprivation has occurred.”) (citing Vineyard v. County of Murray, Ga., 990 F.2d 1207, 1211 (11th Cir.1993)), cert, denied, *1243 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 411 , 139 L.Ed.2d 314 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight v. Pugh
See Rooney v. Watson, 101 F.3d 1378, 1381 (11th Cir.1996) (“[A]n inquiry into a governmental entity’s custom or policy is relevant only when a constitutional deprivation has occurred.”) (citing Vineyard v. County of Murray, Ga., 990 F.2d 1207, 1211 (11th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Enviroglas Products, Inc. v. Enviroglas Products, LLC
See Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.) (citing Tuchman v. DSC Communications Corporation, 14 F.3d 1061, 1068 (5th Cir.1994)), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Scott v. Pfizer Inc.
See Williams v. WMX Techs., Inc., 112 F.3d 175 , 178 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
(2×)
See Evans v. Maryland, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 411 , 139 L.Ed.2d 314 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Balko v. Carnegie Financial Group Inc. (In Re Balko)
See Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177 (5 th Cir.1997)(finding no principled reason why state law fraud claims should escape pleading requirements of federal rules), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Dynegy, Inc. Securities Litigation
See Goldstein v. MCI WorldCom, 340 F.3d 238, 245 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Dynegy, Inc.
See Goldstein v. MCI WorldCom, 340 F.3d 238, 245 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
See Evans v. State, 345 Md. 524 , 693 A.2d 780 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966, 118 S.Ct. 411 , 139 L.Ed.2d 314 (1997); Evans v. State, 333 Md. 660 , 637 A.2d 117 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 833 , 115 S.Ct. 109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 56 (1994); Foster, Evans and Huffington v. State, 305 Md. 306 , 503 A.2d 1326 , cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 722 (1986); Evans v. State, 304 Md. 487 , 499 A.2d 1261 (1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 3310 , 92 L.Ed.2d 722 (1986); Evans v. State, 301 Md. 45 , 481 A.2d 1135 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1034 , 105 S.Ct. 1411 , 84 L.Ed.2d …
examined
Cited "see"
James Terrell v. Brek Larson
(4×)
See Rooney v. Watson, 101 F.3d 1378, 1381 (11th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 (1997); Hill v. Shobe, 93 F.3d 418, 420-21 (7th Cir. 1996); Leddy v. Township of Lower Merion, 114 F. Supp. 2d 372, 376 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Vernon Lee Evans, Jr. v. Willie Smith, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland
See Evans v. State, 345 Md. 524 , 693 A.2d 780 (Md.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 411 , 139 L.Ed.2d 314 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Douglas
Tex. Aug. 24, 2020) (citing Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund, Inc. v. TXU Corp., 565 F.3d 200, 207 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 873 (2009)). 13 Tuchman, 14 F.3d at 1068 (quoting Tel-Phonic Servs., Inc. v. TBS Int’l, Inc., 975 F.2d 1134, 1139 (5th Cir. 1992)); see also Williams v. WMX Techs., Inc., 112 F.3d 175 , 177-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 (1997). 14 See Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Douglas
Tex. Aug. 24, 2020) (citing Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund, Inc. v. TXU Corp., 565 F.3d 200, 207 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 873 (2009)). 16 Tuchman, 14 F.3d at 1068 (quoting Tel-Phonic Servs., Inc. v. TBS Int’l, Inc., 975 F.2d 1134, 1139 (5th Cir. 1992)); see also Williams v. WMX Techs., Inc., 112 F.3d 175 , 177-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 (1997). 17 See Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K.J.C. v. The City of Montgomery
Compare Griffin v. City of Opa-Locka, 261 F.3d 1295, 1303 (11th Cir. 2001) (city manager acted under color of state law when he used his position to be alone with rape victim) with Almand v. DeKalb County, 103 F.3d 1510, 1513 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 (1997) (police officer was not acting under color of state law when he broke down rape victim’s apartment door like any other criminal).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Huber Corporation, 343 F.3d 719, 724 (5th Cir.2003); see also Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 177-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.
See also Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc., 112 F.3d 175, 179 (5th Cir.1997) (Rule 9(b) requires “ ‘the who, what, when, where, and how1 to be laid out.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prime Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Valley Health System (In Re Valley Health System)
In the chapter 11 context, a debtor in possession stands in the shoes of a trustee and is a fiduciary for the estate and its creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 1107 (a); see, e.g., Thompson v. Margen (In re McConville), 110 F.3d 47, 50 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that chapter 11 debtors in possession “were fiduciaries of their own estate owing a duty of care and loyalty to the estate’s creditors”), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997); Woodson v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Count Liberty, LLC
See, e.g., Thompson v. Margen (In re McConville), 110 F.3d 47, 50 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that chapter 11 debtors in possession “were fiduciaries of their own estate owing a duty of care and loyalty to the estate’s creditors”), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 412 , 139 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997); Woodson v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington County
Co. v. New York City, 438 US 104,124 , 98 S Ct 2646 , 57 L Ed 2d *380 631 (1978) (the taxing power is “one obvious example” of an exercise of government power that affects property or economic interests without giving rise to takings claims); see also Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County, 110 F3d 699, 704 (9th Cir 1997), cert den 522 US 966 (1997) (holding that a recycling service charge was analogous to a property tax and therefore not subject to challenge as a taking of property).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LaSusa v. Lake Michigan Trans-Lake Shortcut, Inc.
In circumstances like this, the Court may look “outside the pleadings to other evidence of jurisdictional .amount in the record,” provided that it considers only “evidence of amount in controversy that was available at the moment the petition for removal was filed.” Chase, 110 F.3d at 427-28 ; see also Harmon v. OKI Sys., 115 F.3d 477, 479 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 966 , 118 S.Ct. 413 , 139 L.Ed.2d 316 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Toski
v.
McDonnell
v.
McDonnell
No. 97-217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.