green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.6 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Cheyenne River”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carney v. Attorney General
property' as used in the just compensation clause is defined much more narrowly than in the due process clauses
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
US Ex Rel. Cheyenne River Sioux v. South Dakota
cheyenne river
discussed
Cited "see"
Kruse v. AFLAC International, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Hill v. Hilliard, 945 S.W.2d 948, 951 (Ky.App.1997) (dismissing claims of sexual harassment and retaliation arising under K.R.S. 344 and compelling employee to submit claims to binding arbitration), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 981 , 118 S.Ct. 442 , 139 L.Ed.2d 378 (1997); see also Willis v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 948 F.2d 305 (6th Cir.1991) (compelling arbitration of sexual harassment and discrimination claims under K.R.S. § 344).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.
See Miners v. Cargill Communications, Inc., 113 F.3d 820 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 981 , 118 S.Ct. 441 , 139 L.Ed.2d 378 (1997) (analyzing claims under the MHRA disability provision as analogous to claims under the ADA); Roberts By and Through Rodenberg-Roberts v. KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc., 86 F.3d 844 (8th Cir.1996) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Rutledge v. Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson
S 1132 (a)." Emard v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 153 F.3d 949, 953 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, _____ U.S. _____, 119 S.Ct. 903 , 142 L.Ed.2d 902 (1999); see Buster v. Greisen, 104 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 1997) (Complete preemption occurs only when ERISA both "preempts" the state claim and "displaces the claim with its civil enforcement provision."), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 981 (1999). 14 i. 15 Developing a rule to identify whether ERISA preempts a given state law -the first step in determining whether ERISA completely preempts the law -has bedeviled the Supreme Court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rutledge v. Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson
ERISA completely preempts a claim under state law, permitting the defendant to remove despite the well-pleaded complaint rule, if two circumstances exist: “(1) ERISA preempts the plaintiffs cause of action and (2) the cause of action falls within the scope of [ERISA’s civil enforcement provision,] 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a).” Emard v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 153 F.3d 949, 953 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 903 , 142 L.Ed.2d 902 (1999); see Buster v. Greisen, 104 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.1997) (Complete preemption occurs only when ERISA both “preempts” the state claim and …
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Omega Management, Inc.
See Miners v. Cargill Communications, Inc., 113 F.3d 820, 823 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 981 , 118 S.Ct. 441 , 139 L.Ed.2d 378 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Stroh Die Casting Co., 116 F. 3d 814, 820 (CA7), cert. denied, 522 U. S. 981 (1997); Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Rfg. and Mktg., Inc., 2 F. 3d 493, 503-504 (CA3 1993); Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Pan American Tanning Corp., 993 F. 2d 1017, 1020-1021 (CA2 1993); Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 897 F. 2d 1128 , 1135 1136 (CA11 1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zaidi
v.
Northern Virginia Hospital Corp.
v.
Northern Virginia Hospital Corp.
No. 97-5968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (2) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
Sup. Ct. Va. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 8, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.