green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2001 ·
…issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jacob Plitman
But see Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) (stating that “the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
(2×)
See Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) (“the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel”), cert, denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); Carter v. Sowders, 5 F.3d 975, 981 (6th Cir.1993) (“there must be evidence in the record to support” a defendant’s waiver of a Sixth Amendment right to confrontation for it to be valid).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maurice A. Mason v. Betty Mitchell
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 848 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); cf. Scott v. Mitchell, 209 F.3d 854, 881 (6th Cir.) (“Without effective research into the available mitigating testimony, of course, it would be impossible for the lawyers to have made an informed decision either way.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1021 , 121 S.Ct. 588 , 148 L.Ed.2d 503 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Austin
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherman White v. James Helling, Acting Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
See Clemmons v. Delo, 100 F.3d 1394, 1403 (8th Cir.1996), vacated on rehearing, 124 F.3d 944, 951 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramirez v. State
See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 984, 987 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998). [6] The current version of this subsection is now located at subsection 985.207(2), Florida Statutes (1997). [7] Although Doerr v. State, 383 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1980), was decided under superseded law, see § 39.03(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1975), the statutory language is "sufficiently similar" to the statute applicable in this case that Doerr 's holding "still obtains." Allen v. State, 636 So.2d 494 , 496 n. 2 (Fla.1994). [8] The record reflects that Ramirez's parents came to the s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodge v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See, e.g., Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 849 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998), and cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Texas
(2×)
See, e.g., Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1564 (Fed.Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1089 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heath Allen Wilkins v. Michael Bowersox
See also Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 952 (8th Cir.1997) (noting that the Supreme Court’s decision in Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes did not alter a court’s discretionary power to order an evidentiary hearing), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); Jamison v. Lockhart, 975 F.2d 1377, 1381 (8th Cir.1992) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
College Savings Bank, and United States v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
See Hearings, supra, at 36-37; see also Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1564 , 43 USPQ2d 1398, 1402 (Fed.Cfr.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Regents of the University of California
v.
Eli Lilly & Co.
v.
Eli Lilly & Co.
No. 97-1201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.