green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Zak
See Matter of Hoicka, 442 Mass. 1004 , 1007 n.5 (2004). 7 "the board's recommendation, its experience, and its expertise to try and dispose of disciplinary matters uniformly." Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 455 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Britton v. Board of Bar Examiners
See Strigler v. Board of Bar Examiners, supra, citing Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 456 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998) (failure to fully answer "is a powerful indication that the applicant lacks the good character required for admission to the bar").
discussed
Cited "see"
Britton v. Board of Bar Examiners
See Strigler v. Board of Bar Examiners, supra, citing Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 456 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998) (failure to fully answer “is a powerful indication that the applicant lacks the good character required for admission to the bar”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strigler v. Board of Bar Examiners
See Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 456 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998) (in disciplinary proceeding, “respondent’s candor and trustworthiness [in testimony before hearing committee] both directly affect his capacity to practice law”).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Foley
See Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 453 , cert, denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998); Matter of Tobin, 417 Mass. 92, 101 (1994); Matter of Kenney, 399 Mass. 431, 435 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Weaver v. S. Frank Thompson
The Merits Turning to the merits, we must determine whether Weaver has established that an error of constitutional dimension “had a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.” Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (internal quotation omitted); accord Rodriguez v. Marshall, 125 F.3d 739, 744 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 , 118 S.Ct. 2304 , 141 L.Ed.2d 163 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Moore
See, e.g., Matter of Eisenhauer, 426 Mass. 448, 457 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 919 (1998) (attorney’s lack of candor before hearing committee “further compounded his transgressions”); Matter of Clooney, 403 Mass. 654, 657 (1988) (attorney’s “persistent assertions that he did nothing wrong . . . demonstrated that he ‘continuefd] to be unmindful of certain basic ethical precepts of the legal profession’ ”). c.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brincat
v.
California
v.
California
No. 97-8707.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1998.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.