green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carpenter
See Donahey v. Bogle, 129 F.3d 838, 844 (6th Cir.1997) (en banc) (reinstating the prior panel opinion on all issues not otherwise discussed by the en banc court), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 924 , 118 S.Ct. 2317 , 141 L.Ed.2d 692 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carpenter, Sheila
(2×)
See Donahey v. Bogle, 129 good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule should apply in F.3d 838, 844 (6th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (reinstating the prior this case because the police officers knew additional facts that panel opinion on all issues not otherwise discussed by the en were not included in Captain Lawson’s affidavit, but that, banc court), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 924 (1998). when added to the information contained in the affidavit, would have established probable cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter-Jones Lumber Company v. Ltv Steel Company, Dixie Distributing Company
See Donahey v. Bo-gle, 129 F.3d 838 , 843 (6th Cir.1997), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 924 , 118 S.Ct. 2317 , 141 L.Ed.2d 692 (1998), reinstated, *747 F.3d-, 2000 WL 977376 (6th Cir. Jul. 7, 2000); see also AT&T Global Information Solutions v. Union Tank Car Co., 29 F.Supp.2d 857, 865 (S.D.Ohio 1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mohan Kutty v. United States Dep't of Labor
Carter Jones, 237 F.3d at 746 n. 1; see also Donahey v. Bogle, 129 F.3d 838, 843 (6th Cir.1997), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 924 , 118 S.Ct. 2317 , 141 L.Ed.2d 692 (1998), reinstated, 16 Fed.Appx. 283 (6th Cir.2000) (holding in this CERCLA case that "federal courts must look to state law” when determining "the requisite standard for piercing the veil.”). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alli v. United States
Co., 113 F.3d 572 , 580 (6th Cir.1997) (en banc), vacated on other grounds, sub nom., United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51 , 118 S.Ct. 1876 , 141 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); see also Donahey v. Bogle, 129 F.3d 838, 843 (6th Cir.1997), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 924 , 118 S.Ct. 2317 , 141 L.Ed.2d 692 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dearborn v. DLZ CORP.
Under Michigan law, a “ ‘corporate veil’ may be pierced only where an otherwise separate corporate existence has been used to subvert justice or cause a result that [is] contrary to some other clearly overriding public policy." Seasword v. Hilti, Inc., 449 Mich. 542, 548 , 537 N.W.2d 221 (1995) (internal quotations and citations omitted) (emphasis added); see, also, U.S. v. Cordova Chemical Co. of Michigan, 113 F.3d 572, 580 (6th Cir.1990), vacated on other grounds, sub nom Michigan Department of Environmental Quality v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 924 , 118 S.Ct. 2317 , 141 L.Ed.2d 692 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
v.
Bestfoods and Bestfoods v. Aerojet-General Corp.
v.
Bestfoods and Bestfoods v. Aerojet-General Corp.
No. 97-296; No. 97-464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1998.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. - Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Bestfoods, ante, p. 51. Reported below: 113 F. 3d 572.