green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jackson
congress drafted the statute broadly to include any fraud arising from unauthorized use or counterfeiting of credit cards, debit cards, account numbers, or other devices capable of affording account access, such as by electronic transfer
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lee
See United States v. Hughey, 147 F.3d 423, 432-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S. Ct. 569 , 142 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Johnson, 225 F.Supp.2d 1022, 1058 (N.D.Iowa 2002) (citing United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 779 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998)), rev’d on other grounds, 352 F.3d 339 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Poole v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Shea, 150 F.3d 44, 51 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 568 , 142 L.Ed.2d 473 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Frazier
(2×)
See United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 778 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Henry Frazier, Also Known as Towman, Also Known as Tow, Also Known as Phe, Also Known as Daddy, Also Known as Blue, Also Known as Reuben Matthews, United States of America v. Darren Thomas, Also Known as Dt, United States of America v. Joe Robinson, United States of America v. Phelix T. Frazier, Also Known as Little Phe, Also Known as Phe Phe
See United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 778 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Frazier
(2×)
See United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 778 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Henry Frazier, Also Known as Towman, Also Known as Tow, Also Known as Phe, Also Known as Daddy, Also Known as Blue, Also Known as Reuben Matthews, United States of America v. Darren Thomas, Also Known as Dt, United States of America v. Joe Robinson, United States of America v. Phelix T. Frazier, Also Known as Little Phe, Also Known as Phe Phe
See United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 778 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Alexis Mojica-Baez, United States of America v. Josue G. Reyes-Hernandez, United States of America v. Rodolfo E. Landa-Rivera, United States of America v. Nelson Cartagena-Merced, United States of America v. Jose Ramos-Cartagena
See United States v. Shea, 150 F.3d 44, 51 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fernandez
See United States v. Hughey, 147 F.3d 423, 432-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S. Ct. 569 , 142 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mojica Baez
(2×)
See United States v. Shea, 150 F.3d 44, 51 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 568 , 142 L.Ed.2d 473 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Shea, 150 F.3d 44, 48 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 568 , 142 L.Ed.2d 473 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilliam, Darron G.
See United States v. Shea, 150 F.3d 44, 51-52 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 568 , 142 L.Ed.2d 473 (1998); United States v. Brantley, 68 F.3d 1283, 1289-90 (11th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyra Ann Whitney v. State
See Trammell, 287 S.W.3d at 343-44; Maes v. State, 275 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, *701 no pet.) (“A defendant does not have the right to choose appointed counsel, and unless he waives his right to counsel and chooses to represent himself, or shows adequate reasons for the appointment of new counsel, he must accept court-appointed counsel.”); Long v. State, 137 S.W.3d 726, 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, pet. ref'd); Garner v. State, 864 S.W.2d 92, 98 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref'd) (indicating that an indigent defendant “must accept the counsel appointed by the co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyra Ann Whitney v. State
See Trammell , 287 S.W.3d at 343–44; Maes v. State , 275 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Tex. App.––San Antonio 2008, no pet.) (“A defendant does not have the right to choose appointed counsel, and unless he waives his right to counsel and chooses to represent himself, or shows adequate reasons for the appointment of new counsel, he must accept court-appointed counsel.”); Long v. State , 137 S.W.3d 726, 735 (Tex. App.––Waco 2004, pet. ref’d); Garner v. State , 864 S.W.2d 92, 98 (Tex. App.––Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref’d) (indicating that an indigent defendant “must accept the coun…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicholas Trammell v. State
See Long v. State, 137 S.W.3d 726, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2004, pet. ref’d); Garner v. State, 864 S.W.2d 92, 98 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref’d) (indicating that an indigent 15 defendant “must accept the counsel appointed by the court”); see also United States v. Hughey, 147 F.3d 423, 428 (5th Cir. 1998) (relating that the “Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice is limited, and protects only a paying defendant’s fair or reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel of the defendant’s choice”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicholas Trammell v. State
See Long v. State , 137 S.W.3d 726, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2004, pet. ref’d); Garner v. State , 864 S.W.2d 92, 98 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref’d) (indicating that an indigent defendant “must accept the counsel appointed by the court”); see also United States v. Hughey , 147 F.3d 423, 428 (5th Cir. 1998) (relating that the “Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice is limited, and protects only a paying defendant’s fair or reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel of the defendant’s choice”), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1030 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trammell v. State
(2×)
See Long v. State, 137 S.W.3d 726, 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, pet. ref'd); Garner v. State, 864 S.W.2d 92, 98 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref'd) (indicating that an indigent defendant "must accept the counsel appointed by the court"); see also United States v. Hughey, 147 F.3d 423, 428 (5th Cir.1998) (relating that the "Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice is limited, and protects only a paying defendant's fair or reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel of the defendant's choice"), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 569 , 142 L.Ed.2d 474 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Haji v. Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Moore, 149 F.3d 773, 779 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1030 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Camarillo
v.
Office of Personnel Management
v.
Office of Personnel Management
No. 98-6585.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1998.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.