Nutritional Health All. v. Shalala, 525 U.S. 1040 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Nutritional Health All. v. Shalala, 525 U.S. 1040 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“claim is within the 10 . . .”
26 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ariel v. Town of Kingston (massappct, 2007-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ariel v. Town of Kingston
Mass. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
claim is within the 10 . . .
discussed Cited "see" Loving v. United States
C.A.A.F. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See supra pp. 239-40 (rejecting the position of the Government presented in Brief for Respondents in Opposition at 10-11, Loving v. Hart, 525 U.S. 1040 , 119 S.Ct. 590 , 142 L.Ed.2d 533 (No. 98-251)). 91 .
cited Cited "see" Szymkowski v. Szymkowski
Mass. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ford v. Grafton, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 715, 721 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1040 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Shannon v. Computer Associates International, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burns v. Stone Forest Industries, Inc., 147 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.) (stating that, pursuant to the WARN Act, “workers get what they would have earned in the two-month notice period, were there no shutdown”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1040 , 119 S.Ct. 591 , 142 L.Ed.2d 533 (1998). ¶ 18 Accordingly, “[t]he violation period is comprised only of those ‘days after the shutdown or layoff in violation of [the WARN Act] and extends for the number of days that notice was required but not given.’ ” Carpenters Dist.
discussed Cited "see" Dougherty v. Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nutritional Health Alliance v. Shalala, 144 F.3d 220, 226 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1040 , 119 S.Ct. 589 , 142 L.Ed.2d 532 (1998); New Mexicans for Bill Richardson v. Gonzales, 64 F.3d 1495, 1499 (10th Cir.1995); Cheffer v. Reno, 55 F.3d 1517 , 1523 n. 12 (11th Cir.1995); ACORN v. City of Tulsa, 835 F.2d 735, 739-40 (10th Cir.1987); Sanger v. Reno, 966 F.Supp. 151, 161 (E.D.N.Y.1997).
discussed Cited "see" Dougherty v. Town Of North Hempstead Board Of Zoning Appeals
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nutritional Health Alliance v. Shalala, 144 F.3d 220, 226 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1040 , 119 S.Ct. 589 , 142 L.Ed.2d 532 (1998); New Mexicans for Bill Richardson v. Gonzales, 64 F.3d 1495, 1499 (10th Cir.1995); Cheffer v. Reno, 55 F.3d 1517 , 1523 n. 12 (11th Cir.1995); ACORN v. City of Tulsa, 835 F.2d 735, 739-40 (10th Cir.1987); Sanger v. Reno, 966 F.Supp. 151, 161 (E.D.N.Y.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nutritional Health Alliance
v.
Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 98-235.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1998.
525 U.S. 1040
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 70%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.