cited Cited "see" Coblentz v. State See Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000, 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 722 So.2d 192 (Fla.), and cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1058 , 119 S.Ct. 624 , 142 L.Ed.2d 563 (1998).

discussed Cited "see" Westerheide v. State See Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 722 So.2d 192 (Fla.), and cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1058 , 119 S.Ct. 624 , 142 L.Ed.2d 563 (1998). [4] *645 In ascertaining the legislative intent under the first prong of the test, the Court in Hendricks examined the legislature's description of the act as a "civil commitment procedure" and noted the placement of the act in the Kansas probate code as opposed to the criminal code.

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Floyd See United States v. Williams, 155 F.3d 418, 419-20 (4th Cir.) (applying test established in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932)), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1058 (1998); United States v. Mitchell, 104 F.3d 649, 652 (4th Cir. 1997) (outlining elements of § 924(c) offense); United States v. Bailey , 990 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1993) (outlining elements of § 1951(a) offense).