green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Noel v. Hall
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051 , 1057 n. 11 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Noel v. Hall
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051 , 1057 n.11 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carr v. City of Cisco
See Trail Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Houston, 957 S.W.2d 625, 631-32 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet’n den’d), cert, den’d, 525 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 802 , 142 L.Ed.2d 663 (1999); Waddy v. City of Houston, 834 S.W.2d 97, 102-03 (TexApp.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ den’d).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Dallas v. Lowenberg
See Trail Enterprises, *50 Inc. v. City of Houston, 957 S.W.2d 625 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, writ den’d), cert. den’d, 525 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 802 , 142 L.Ed.2d 663 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n. 2 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n. 1, 164 (2d Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY EX REL. SPITZER v. Kraeger
See United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 298 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Blair G. McLachlan v. James Bell Michael George Charles Smith, Opinion
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051 , 1063 n. 18 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S. Cl. 804, 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weslin
See United States v. Weslin, 964 F.Supp. 83 (W.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd, 156 F.3d 292 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999). *549 One of the plaintiffs in the Spitzer case is Buffalo GYN Womenservices, Inc., a clinic at which reproductive healthcare services, including abortions, are provided.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gregory Ferguson, AKA \Black Greggo
(2×)
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n.2 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n.1, 164 (2d Cir. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vellone v. FIRST UNION BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC.
See LaPrade v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc., 146 F.3d 899 (D.C.Cir.1998) (where district court stayed action pending arbitration and plaintiff obtained ex parte order from state court staying arbitration, district court properly lifted stay imposed by state court and entered sanctions against plaintiffs counsel), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also Miller v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., 545 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir.1977) (“[Cjases have held vacation of a stay [pending arbitration] proper where the defendant seeking the stay hindered the progress of arbitrat…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henke
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051, 1068-69 (9th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Steven J. Henke, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Chan M. Desaigoudar, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1071 (1999). 30 With respect to Desaigoudar, the jury heard evidence that he sold a portion of his stock after learning of Cal Micro's false revenue reporting scheme and that his sudden decision to "diversify" his portfolio came after receiving this information.
discussed
Cited "see"
LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
See LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 146 F.3d 899, 903 (D.C.Cir.1998), cert. den., 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999) (holding that court that stays civil action pending arbitration retains jurisdiction to confirm arbitration award).
cited
Cited "see"
Auge v. NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
See United States v. Beaty, 147 F. 3d 522, 525-26 (6th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 802 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 663 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.
See Trail Enters., Inc. v. City of Houston, 957 S.W.2d 625, 630 (Tex.App—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 119 S.Ct. 802 , 142 L.Ed.2d 663 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051, 1055 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999) (citing Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service, 36 F.3d 457, 462 (5th Cir.1994)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. Fred Hart, Jr.
Id.; see also United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 297 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Korthauer
Cathey v. Booth, 900 S.W.2d 339, 341 (Tex.1995); see also Trail Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Houston, 957 S.W.2d 625, 630 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 802 , 142 L.Ed.2d 663 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. Fred Hart
Id.; see also United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 297 (2d Cir. 1998) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Operation Rescue National
See also, United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 298 (2nd Cir.1998) (rejecting defendants’ mens rea defense that they intended to save the lives of babies, rather than to violate FACE, since that statute merely requires that the defendant intend to in *954 terfere with the obtaining and provision of reproductive services), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeCuir
v.
County of Los Angeles
v.
County of Los Angeles
No. 98-809.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1999.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.