green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Byron & Jean Barton, Apps. v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.a. And Quality Loan Service Corp., Resps.
See Tenmore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 329-30 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998) (dismissal under CR 12(b)(6) is appropriate only if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts which would justify recovery), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 1171 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Armando Grimaldo, - United States of America v. Julio Escobedo-Romero
See United States v. Maggard, 156 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1170 , 119 S.Ct. 1094 , 143 L.Ed.2d 93 (1999), and cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1058 , 119 S.Ct. 1372 , 143 L.Ed.2d 532 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Carroll Beckett
(2×)
See United States v. Tobin, 155 F.3d 636 , 641 n. 4 (3d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1171 , 119 S.Ct. 1094 , 143 L.Ed.2d 94 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Beckett
See United States v. Tobin, 155 F.3d 636 , 641 n.4 (3d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1171 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian David Irons
See United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1043 (9th Cir.1998) (offenses of theft and aggravated theft bear no factual similarity to offense of issuing false financial statement and are not related for purpose of § 4A1.2), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. at 1094, 143 L.Ed.2d 94 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Cobb v. E.I. duPont deNemours & Co.
See Cobb v. E.I. duPont deNemours & Co., 153 F.3d 719 (4th Cir.1998), cert denied, 525 U.S. 1171 , 119 S.Ct. 1096 , 143 L.Ed.2d 96 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Napoli, A/K/A John Bianco, A/K/A \Vince
See United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1045-46 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1094 , 143 L.Ed.2d 94 (1999) (a consolidation of sentences after a Rule 20 transfer should have been related under § 4A1.2); United States v. Woods, 976 F.2d 1096, 1100 (7th Cir.1992) (not requiring factual relaledness, because, although inclined to disagree with the Guidelines’s broad definition of relatedness, it has been adopted in the U.S.S.G.); United States v. Dorsey, 888 F.2d 79, 80-81 (11th Cir.1989) (upward departure upheld after district court held sentences imposed after a Rule 20…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tistcareno-Rios
See United States v. Maggard, 156 F.3d 843, 847-48 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1094 (1999) (government must prove by preponderance of evidence drug quantity attributable to defendant); United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993) (this court will not overturn district court’s drug-quantity determination unless it is clearly erroneous).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel A. Ramirez
See United States v. Maggard, 156 F.3d 843, 847-48 (8th Cir. 1998) (government must prove by preponderance of evidence drug quantity attributable to defendant), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1094 (1999); United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993) (this court will not overturn district court&s drug-quantity determination unless it is clearly erroneous; court&s findings as to credibility of witness in making drug-quantity determination are virtually unreviewable on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
See Unger, 915 F.2d at 761 (stating that defendant attacking validity of conviction must show "that he lacked counsel at [a critical] juncture and had not waived his right in such regard"); see also United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1041 (9th Cir. 1998) ("the defendant must present evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption that there was a valid waiver of counsel"), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1094 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
See Unger, 915 F.2d at 761 (stating that defendant attacking validity of conviction must show “that he lacked counsel at [a critical] juncture and had not waived his right in such regard”); see also United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1041 (9th Cir.1998) (“the defendant must present evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption that there was a valid waiver of counsel”), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1094 , 143 L.Ed.2d 94 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tobin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-7806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1999.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.