green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.9 score
“bad faith, like negligence, is a traditional jury issue, implying deferential review; and it is hard to see why less deference ought to be paid the trier of fact when it happens to be a judge rather than a jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Chaparro-Alcantara
bad faith, like negligence, is a traditional jury issue, implying deferential review; and it is hard to see why less deference ought to be paid the trier of fact when it happens to be a judge rather than a jury.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wettstain
See United States v. Hill, 142 F.3d 305, 312 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898 , 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ervin
See United States v. Hill, 142 F.3d 305, 310 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898 , 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Ladum, 141 F.3d 1328, 1344 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898 , 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Herman Steverson
See United States v. Hill, 142 F.3d 305, 308 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 898, 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista
See Mathis v. John Morden Buick, Inc., 136 F.3d 1153, 1155 (7th Cir.) (“ ‘Bad faith’ is a question of fact like any other, so the trier of fact is entitled to draw any reasonable inference.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898 , 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998); Door Sys. v. Pro-Line Door Sys., Inc., 126 F.3d 1028, 1031 (7th Cir.1997) (“Bad faith, like negligence, is a traditional jury issue, implying deferential review; and it is hard to see why less deference ought to be paid the trier of fact when it happens to be a judge rather than a jury.”). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aundre Sterling Wright
See United States v. Ladum, 141 F.3d 1328, 1341 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898 , 119 S.Ct. 225 , 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998) and 525 U.S. 1021 , 119 S.Ct. 549 , 142 L.Ed.2d 457 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Guevara
See United States v. Cortinas, 142 F.3d 242, 248 (5th Cir.) (reviewing for plain error where parties challenging the limiting instructions as being erroneous or inadequate failed to object or propose that other, preferable instructions should have been given), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 224 (1998), and cert. denied, No. 98-6654, 1998 WL 772941 (U.S. Nov. 30, 1998). both an arrest on January 20, 1978 for aiding and assisting the illegal entry of an alien, to which Hernandez pled guilty on January 30, 1978, and an April 12, 1979 arrest for the same charge, to which Hernandez pled guilty on April 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Guevara
See United States v. Cortinas, 142 F.3d 242, 248 (5th Cir.) (reviewing for plain error where parties challenging the limiting instructions as being erroneous or inadequate fail to object or propose that other, preferable instructions should have been given), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 224 , 142 L.Ed.2d 184 (1998), and cert. denied, No. 98-6654, 1998 WL 772941 (U.S. Nov. 30,1998).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE GOMEZ, also known as Monstro
See United States v. Cortinas, 142 F.3d 242, 250 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 224 and 119 S. Ct. 573 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garcia
See, e.g., United States v. Linwood, 142 F.3d 418, 425 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 897 , 119 S.Ct. 224 , 142 L.Ed.2d 184 (1998); United States v. Akinrinade, 61 F.3d 1279, 1283 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 999 , 116 S.Ct. 541 , 133 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Breck M. Swanquist
It is well settled in this circuit that a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction as to his or her particular theory of defense provided: “(1) the instruction represents an accurate statement of the law; (2) the instruction reflects a theory that is supported by the evidence; (3) the instruction reflects a theory which is not already part of the charge; and (4) the failure to include the instruction would deny the appellant a fair trial.” United States v. Edwards, 36 F.3d 639, 645 (7th Cir.1994) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Linwood, 142 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir.) (quoti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Anderson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
v.
Anderson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
No. 98-5306.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.