discussed Cited "see" Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ficken See United States v. Bartelho, 129 F.3d 663, 673 (1st Cir.1997), cert. denied 525 U.S. 905 , 119 S.Ct. 241 , 142 L.Ed.2d 198 (1998) (“A trial judge may strike a witness’s direct testimony if he flatly refuses to answer cross-examination questions related to the details of his direct testimony.” (internal quotations omitted)).

cited Cited "see" Smith v. Mills See Smith v. Tennessee, 525 U.S. 905 , 119 S.Ct. 240 , 142 L.Ed.2d 197 (1998).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Peter Simonelli See United States v. Bartelho, 129 F.3d 663, 675 (1st Cir.1997) (applying abuse of discretion standard), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 905 , 119 S.Ct. 241 , 142 L.Ed.2d 198 (1998); Tigges v. Cataldo, 611 F.2d 936, 938 (1st Cir.1979) (same).