Wood v. United States, 525 U.S. 978 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Wood v. United States, 525 U.S. 978 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
104 citation events (86 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Martinez v. State (texcrimapp, 2004-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. State, 962 S.W.2d 544, 564 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998); Fisher v. State, 379 S.W.2d 900, 902 (Tex.Cr.App. 1964) (decided under former law set out in Article 726); Searcy v. State, 28 Tex.App. 513 , 13 S.W. 782 (Tex.Ct.App.1890).
cited Cited "see" Jones v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. State, 962 S.W.2d 544, 549 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998). . 470 U.S. 298 , 105 S.Ct. 1285 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985). .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Fisher
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 356 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Reno
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 356 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" American Express Centurion Bank v. Truong (In Re Truong)
Bankr. D. Conn. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Rembert v. AT & T Universal Card Services, Inc. (In re Rembert), 141 F.3d 277, 281 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 438 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998); Anastas v. American Savings Bank (In re Anastas), 94 F.3d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Cassell v. Cassell
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rembert v. AT & T Universal Card Servs., Inc. (In re Rembert), 141 F.3d 277, 280 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 438 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998); Nicholson v. Isaacman (In re Isaacman), 26 F.3d 629, 631 (6th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lacy
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 356 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lacy
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 356 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Lind-Waldock & Co. v. Morehead
4th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rembert v. AT & T Universal Card Sews., Inc. (In re Rembert), 141 F.3d 277, 281 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 438 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998); Citibank (S.D.), N.A v. Eashai (In re Eashai), 87 F.3d 1082, 1090 (9th Cir.1996); see also Field v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59, 69 , 116 S.Ct. 437 , 133 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995) (concluding that elements of § 523(a)(2) incorporate the general common law of torts).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213, 1217 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 356 (1998) (holding that the admission of the results of various tests administered to the defendant as part of a competency evaluation was not error and refusing to adopt a per se rule making all test results from competency evaluations inadmissible because "the statutory scheme does not forbid the use of competency tests at trial"); United States v. Santos, 131 F.3d 16, 20 (1st Cir.1997) (finding no prejudice in the admission of a psychologist's testimony that…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lentz v. Spadoni
1st Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Rembert 141 F.3d 277, 281 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 438 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Matter Of: Constance P. Mercer, Debtor. At&t Universal Card Services v. Constance P. Mercer
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Rembert v. AT&T Universal Card Servs., Inc. (In re Rembert), 141 F.3d 277, 281 (6th Cir.) (use of credit card is implied representation of intent, but not ability, to repay), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 438 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998); Anastas v. American Sav.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rocha v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Pannell v. State, 666 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App.1984)(disciplinary rule) to Henderson v. State, 962 S.W.2d 544, 553-554 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 978 , 119 S.Ct. 437 , 142 L.Ed.2d 357 (1998)(attorney-client privilege).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
United States
No. 98-6336.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1998.
525 U.S. 978
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.