green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ginest v. Board of County Commissioners
(2×)
See Loyd v. Alabama Dep’t of Corrections, 176 F.3d 1336, 1342 (11th Cir.) (reversing the district court’s refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing pri- or to terminating the consent decree, reasoning that “[i]t would read all meaning out of [§ 3626(b)(3) ] to force the party opposing termination to show that the consent decree meets the requirements of § 3626(b)(3) and then not provide that party with the opportunity to present evidence on that point”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1061 , 120 S.Ct. 613 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999); Berwanger, 178 F.3d at 839-40 (holding that the district court e…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ginest v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF CARBON CTY., WY
(2×)
See Loyd v. Alabama Dep't of Corrections, 176 F.3d 1336, 1342 (11th Cir.) (reversing the district court's refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing prior to terminating the consent decree, reasoning that "[i]t would read all meaning out of [§ 3626(b)(3) ] to force the party opposing termination to show that the consent decree meets the requirements of § 3626(b)(3) and then not provide that party with the opportunity to present evidence on that point"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1061 , 120 S.Ct. 613 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999); Berwanger, 178 F.3d at 839-40 (holding that the district court erred by le…
cited
Cited "see"
Katz v. Regents of the University of California
See Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 858 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 614 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Everett Hadix, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Perry M. Johnson,defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
See Loyd v. Alabama Dep’t of Corrections, 176 F.3d 1336, 1342 (11th Cir.) (reversing the district court’s refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing pri- or to terminating the consent decree, reasoning that “[i]t would read all meaning out of [§ 3626(b)(3) ] to force the party opposing termination to show that the consent decree meets the requirements of § 3626(b)(3) and then not provide that party with the opportunity to present evidence on that point”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 613 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999); Berwanger, 178 F.3d at 839-40 (holding that the district court err…
cited
Cited "see"
Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton
See Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 856 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 614 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosedale Plaza Group, LLC v. BP West Coast Products LLC
(2×)
See also Unocal Corp. v. Kaabipour, 177 F.3d 755, 767 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1061 , 120 S.Ct. 614 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Arizona v. Dennis Johnson
(2×)
Moreover, a trial judge, as “governor of the trial,” Quercia v. United States, 289 U.S. 466, 469 , 53 S.Ct. 698 , 77 L.Ed. 1321 (1933), enjoys “wide discretion in the matter of charging the jury.” Charlton v. Kelly, 156 F. 433, 438 (9th Cir.1907); see also, e.g., Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 860 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1061 , 120 S.Ct. 614 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999) (trial judges have “substantial latitude in tailoring jury instructions”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brandon H. Ex Rel. Richard H. v. Kennewick School District No. 17
See, e.g., Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 858 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, City of Westminster v. Herr, — U.S. - , 120 S.Ct. 614 , 145 L.Ed.2d 509 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loyd
v.
Alabama Department of Corrections
v.
Alabama Department of Corrections
No. 99-248.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1999.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.