green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Freddie Eugene Owens v. Bryan P. Stirling
See Bryan v. Moore, 528 U.S. 1133, 1133 (2000) (dismissing the writ "[i]n light of the representation by the State of Florida, through its Attorney General, that petitioner's 'death sentence will be carried out by lethal injection, unless petitioner affirmatively elects death by electrocution,' pursuant to the recent amendments to Section 922.10 of the Florida Statutes").
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Skatzes, Unpublished Decision (1-31-2003)
See Bryan v. Moore (1999), 528 U.S. 960 , 120 S.Ct. 394 , dismissed (2000), 528 U.S. 1133 , 120 S.Ct. 1003 ; Carter , 89 Ohio St.3d at 608 . {¶ 404} Finally, in his supplemental brief, Skatzes argues that Ohio's capital sentencing provisions are unconstitutional pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Ring v. Arizona (2002), ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2428 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Esposito v. State
See, e.g., Bryan v. Moore, 528 U. S. 1133 (120 SC 1003, 145 LE2d 927) (2000) (dismissing writ of certiorari upon Florida’s adoption of a law providing that the “death sentence will be carried out by lethal injection, unless petitioner affirmatively elects death by electrocution”); Gomez v. Fierro, 519 U. S. 918 (117 SC 285, 136 LE2d 204) (1996) (vacating and remanding in light of California’s adoption of a law allowing condemned prisoners to elect lethal injection as an alternative to lethal gas).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Democratic Party
v.
Jones, Secretary of State of California
v.
Jones, Secretary of State of California
No. 99-401.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Republican Party of Alaska et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 3, 2000. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 31, 2000. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 17, 2000. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.