green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Chapman
attempts to cover up involvement in the crime are among other circumstances from which premeditation and deliberation can be inferred.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Morris
(2×)
all that is required to support convictions for a felony offense and related felony murder 'is that the elements of the underlying offense and the murder occur in a time frame that can be perceived as a single transaction.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Copley
See State v. Jones, 355 N.C. 117, 133 (2002) (citing State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 451 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 (1999)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayes v. Waltz
See State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428 , 451-52, 509 S.E.2d 178 , 193-94 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 120 S.Ct. 95 , 145 L.Ed.2d 80 (1999). *617 The portions of Plaintiff's closing argument challenged by Defendant on appeal fall into two general categories: (1) contentions regarding the credibility of Defendant's and Ms. Hayes' trial testimony; and (2) alleged factual inaccuracies or misrepresentations of the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLC
(2×)
P. 10(a) (2006); see State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 438 , 509 S.E.2d 178, 186 (1998) (the appellant failed to preserve issue when the appellant failed to assign error), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 120 S.Ct. 95 , 145 L.Ed.2d 80 (1999); see also State v. Johnson, 320 N.C. 746, 754 , 360 S.E.2d 676, 681 (1987) (the appellant failed to preserve an issue without an assignment of error). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Peterson
(2×)
See State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 453 , 509 S.E.2d 178, 194 (1998) (prosecutor may respond, in closing argument, to defense criticism of State’s witnesses or investigation of the crime), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Anderson
See State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428 , 509 S.E.2d 178 (1998) (allowing the use of multiple, gory photographs of victim’s body that were admitted for different illustrative purposes), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Prevatte
See State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 453 , 509 S.E.2d 178 , *247 194 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Meyer
When defendant fails to object during closing argument, as was the case here, “the standard of review is whether the argument was so grossly improper that the trial court erred in failing to intervene ex mero motu.” State v. Blakeney, 352 N.C. 287, 320 , 531 S.E.2d 799, 822 (2000); accord State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 451 , 509 S.E.2d 178, 193 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
Id . at 607, 447 S.E.2d at 367 (quoting Williams , 308 N.C. at 69 , 301 S.E.2d at 349 ); see also State v. Trull , 349 N.C. 428 , 448, 509 S.E.2d 178 , 192 (1998) (concluding that the defendant's actions in destroying evidence and attempting to cover up his involvement in the murder "permit the inference that defendant acted with premeditation and deliberation"), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 835 , 120 S.Ct. 95 , 145 L.Ed. 2d 80 (1999) ; State v. Scott , 343 N.C. 313 , 341, 471 S.E.2d 605 , 622 (1996) (concluding that evidence tending to show, among other things, that the "[d]efendant lied to everyo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
(2×)
State v. Cheek, 351 N.C. 48, 76 , 520 S.E.2d 545, 561 (1999) (finding no error in the trial court's submission of separate aggravating circumstances under N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000 (e)(5) based on defendant's commission of a robbery and a kidnapping during the course of the murder), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1245 , 120 S.Ct. 2694 , 147 L.Ed.2d 965 (2000); State v. Bond, 345 N.C. 1, 34-35 , 478 S.E.2d 163, 181 (1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1124 , 117 S.Ct. 2521 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1997) (same); see also State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 454 , 509 S.E.2d 178, 195 (1998) (no error to submit both rape and ki…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roache
State v. Grooms, 353 N.C. at 81, 540 S.E.2d at 732 ; see also State v. Trull, 349 N.C. 428, 451 , 509 S.E.2d 178, 193 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 835 , 145 L.
Trull
v.
North Carolina
v.
North Carolina
No. 98-9424.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.